User talk:Contributer67

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your edits to The Bachelors are in variance with what is claimed by Con Cluskey on his talk page, and [1] - I have removed such parts as I can, leaving some. I still think the whole part "The Split and beyond" has no relevance to the actual events - If you have independent verifiable proof for your claims please quote them. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:SOAP and WP:COI. Thank you. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Richard

Having not viewed the article on The Bachelors for some time I was shocked to find it much altered with changes which are basically untruths and containing gratuitous comment re. the involvement of a Mr. Kinsella, who I believe is the same Mr. Kinsella involved in dubious actions re. Robbie Williams.

Wikipedia is not a place for such comment and is meant as a factual truthful reference. It is not an advertising place for individuals.

I have corrected the article [The Split and Beyond] to reflect the truth of the Split and beyond. The neutral perspective.

All my information is from well documented and easily available in distributed truthful and official documents and is noted as such.

I have no knowledge of a Con Cluskey talk page. Perhaps you could elaborate.

Contributer67

I have responded on the article's talk page, but I reiterate, I have not edited the article, save for removing the link to John Stoke's Bachelors, which, as you pointed out, was no longer available, however, another editor has correctly added it again, now it is back online. If your claims are correct and there is verifiable independent confirmation from reputable sources ie BBC, Newspapers etc I will happily edit to reflect that. I have never added anything which couldn't be verified from third parties.

Perhaps you have a photo that can be used from the days when the Bachelors were in their heyday - back in the 60s, early 70s. --Richhoncho (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Bachelors

The link for The Bachelors featuring John Stokes is a legitimate link to an existing site. If, as you claim, the that site is contravention of a high court judgement then you should use that judgement to have the site removed. Meanwhile it remains a legitimate link in the history of the Bachelors, and removing the link from Wikipedia could be construed as vandalism. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)