Talk:Convair B-36 variants

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Aircraft WikiProject

I do not really understand the purpose of this page. It has the XB, YB and -A model? This does not make sense to me. Shouldn't this page, if anything, be a more indepth discussion of the XC-99 and YB-60? If it is intended to cover all variants then there is much more work to be done.Patrick Berry 17:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I started it some time ago and haven't finished it. My apologies. Ingoolemo ^talk 19:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey, no worries, I will try to help out with it then. You thinking just the B-36A-J plus XB and YB?Patrick Berry 19:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I think if the references could be cleaned up and perhaps more citations added this could be a GA, right now I'm thinking just less than a B-class. --Colputt 18:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)