Talk:Continuity of Operations Plan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Computer security?

I'm not up to speed on wiki-policy, so could a more senior member weigh in on whether the computer security section at the end of the article (after the horizontal rule) is appropriate? I've never seen it done on any other article, and it doesn't seem right to just stick it at the bottom of the page. Are there rules for this? --Jweed 19:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

You're absolutely right; it was off-topic and incorrectly styled as well. Removed. AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 20:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Get rid of contents box?

It lokos out of place and unneeded. What does anyone think about my getting rid of it. --Gbinal 21:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

-Never mind. It seems to be better now. Peace. --Gbinal 23:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Outdated?

It seems that this directive or "Plan B" was removed by the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive

(22) Revocation. Presidential Decision Directive 67 of October 21, 1998 ("Enduring Constitutional Government and Continuity of Government Operations"), including all Annexes thereto, is hereby revoked. DeathscytheH64 17:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, its noted in the wikipedia entry. DeathscytheH64 17:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)