Talk:Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
The cleanup tag was placed when I had only written the titles of the chapters, and so may not apply anymore. That said, I'm not certain whether my chapter-based format is the most effective layout for wikipedia. Thoughts?--Heyitspeter 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- i assume the cleanup tag can go. my only suggestion (knowing next to nothing of rorty) is to expand with a section on the work's reception. ⇒ bsnowball 16:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
GA status?
I don't know exactly how this is done, but if possible I'd like to nominate this article for Good Article status. It is rad clear to the layman.Martin McCarvill 17:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
