Talk:Constitutionality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] merge suggestion
definitely merge unconstitutional to constitutionality. Or delete unconstitutional and redirect, since it doesn't say anything new. RJII 02:48, 2 December 2005 (UTC) this user says: Do it!
- I concur with the redirect. unconstitutional is unnecessary. --Jonathan Patt 20:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
unconstitutional covers the exact same topic as constitutionality. They should be merged. Dated 12-21-05
I also agree they are identical. 84.65.129.85 17:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I disagree unconstitutional and constitutionality are two different words!!!!!!!!!!!
These should be merged, if for no other reason than the fact that "unconstitutional" is an adjective (only a descriptor for something else) while Constitutionality is a noun, a freestanding concept. BD2412 T 04:53, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
