Talk:Constitutionalist Liberal Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Central America, which collaborates on articles related to Central America. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Political parties, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of political parties-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to "featured" and "good article" standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. [View this template] |
| Portal | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
Shouldn't this article be called "Constitutionalist Liberal Party"? Silverhelm 17:33, 14 September 2005 (UTC).
- You're right. the official name of the party is "Constitutionalist Liberal Party" (Partido Liberal Constitucionalista) Magicartpro 23:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Liberal International
Does anyone know why PLC left the Liberal International? --Soman 19:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- The LI considered (in 2005) that the PLC was not a Liberal Party by their standards. The ALN was accepted as an observer in the LI in Sept. 2006. The PLC was (at the time of their expulsion) also an observer in the LI, not a full member. Magicartpro 23:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] August 20 rally
I removed this information from the article, both because it is POV to say that it is the largest political force in Nicaragua based on this, and because this rally may not be important in the long run. Academic Challenger 20:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PLC flag.png
Image:PLC flag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
