Talk:Constantinianism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] POV?

Since when did calling a spade a spade become "POV"? Is the truth so unpalatable that it needs whitewashing? My Wikidness 18:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV!

I just put a POV tag on the article. It appears that, unbeknownst to me, this article has had POV charges before. This is hardly surprising. Modernism is the "Modernist heresy"? The term Protestant arose from "bigoted opposition" to the Diet of Speyer? This is indeed "contentious POV". Kevinsam 07:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Removed the phrases quoted above and made a few other changes. However, I am worried bias remains that I can't see, not being well-versed in the relevant history of Christian doctrine. Tagged pov-check and will look to draw this to the attention of a wider audience. It appears there is already a neutrality discussion at Constantinian shift - these should probably be connected. Kevinsam 07:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll say. The Catholic Church has not adopted "modernism." As far as I know most everything in LAMENTABILI SANE is still valid. The Catholic Church does not believe that the truth changes, that Christ did not really found the Church, or that all religions are equal. It doesn't even accept that people should believe in religions purely based on where "the light of reason" takes them. (This is Pius IX rather than X and dealing with a part of that Syllabus people ignore. Proposition 15 condemns a specific book that said your religion should be whatever you reason out and there's no need it based in any tradition or revelation)--T. Anthony 05:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

This is just a dreadful article, worse even than Constantinian shift. It is unclear whose point of view is being put forward, but it launches too many POV attacks as statements of fact. --Rumping 15:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)