Talk:Conspiracy of Calaspia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Reviews
I think the Reviews section is a bit much. It's bordering on POV, especially since there is barely any other information about the book in the article (its plot, characters, ect. standard things to discuss aside from every positive review under the sun). Also, has there been no negative criticism at all? Surely, not every single review has said only positive things. Wikipedia is neutral. It goes against the concept of a neutral encyclopedia to present only one side of the subject. Also, review quotes should be limited in scope to the book, not including general statements regarding the Guptara twins. In the same line of thought, there should be citations for every quote in the reviews section. It's not enough to say who said it or where it was said. Leebo86 21:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
There IS NO plot summary whatsoever. Terrible article. I shall fix it... eventually Nidomiel 17:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
in fact, all of the entries of the writers seem like an advert for their work MoMaBo (talk) 10:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)