Talk:Conspiracy Theory (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This movie has no directors commentary on any DVD version in any country. That should be removed from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.111.129 (talk) 21:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
(Movie) should not be capitalized. --dan
- moved. --mav
(William M. Connolley 16:08, 2004 Mar 11 (UTC)) This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, but isnt it a poor idea to distonguish a film and an idea by capitalisation? The movie ought to be Conspiracy theory (movie).
- However, his rant about fluoride in the water has, over the years, been increasingly echoed by doctors and scientists as a health risk, particularly to children.
The sitation following this statement is a pretty poor one. If there's any evidence that the above is the case, e.g. a survey from a scientific periodical, it should be linked to; otherwise the statement and current link should be removed.
Contents |
[edit] Controversy?
Why is the opening contraversial? as it is most of that information looks more suited to the trivia segment. 81.152.196.46 13:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I was just wondering why conspiracy theory goes straight to here. Isn't the topic that the movie is based on more relevant than the movie? If I knew how to make it the lead article I would.
- I agree, but I also don't know how to make the idea the primary redirect. --Lexein 10:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Synopsis
- Lack of Synopsis section will keep this article from getting to Good Article status. I don't have a copy of the film. Remember, Wikipedia does include spoilers. Anyone? --Lexein 10:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Warning
- The drive-by tagging of this article is not permitted, and will be reverted. Per idea of WP:NPOV_dispute, placement of tags must be accompanied by discussion in Talk. --Lexein 22:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia
- The Trivia section needs to be integrated into the rest of the article, as History, Production, and Related Conspiracies. --Lexein 22:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Conspiracy theory poster.jpg
Image:Conspiracy theory poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)