Talk:Conserved current

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mathematics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating:	Stub Class	Low Priority	Field: Analysis
Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Click to show/hide comments. Please add to or update the comments to suggest improvements to the article. Please add useful comments here--Cronholm144 07:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Comments: edit – history – watch – refresh Please add useful comments here--Cronholm144 07:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Tautology alert

I came across this page following a link from "Noether's Theorem" and found this definition. I think I can intuit from the example what is meant, but can anybody come up with something pithy to define it without reference back to the theorem? Please forgive any breaches of etiquette, I'm very new. Toospaice 05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest and participation. The lead is talking about why the notion of conserved current is important. The definition is given by the formula below that:

In words, there is a quantitative attribute (like electric charge or energy) which can move around, but can never appear from nothing nor disappear to nothing. OK? JRSpriggs 09:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)