Talk:Conscientious objection to military taxation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve tax-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-priority on the Project's priority scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's comments page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

Does RFPTFA need its own page, or should discussion of it be included in this one? -Moorlock 00:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

POV - "bloated military spending"? Bias creeping in there. Perhaps "bloated" in the US - I don't know - but here in the UK it's quite the opposite: funding is very low and resources are overstretched. Panlane 08:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

Conscientious objection to military taxation → Conscientious objection to military taxation in the United States This article deals almost exclusively about this phenomenon in the United States. Please discuss at Talk:Tax protester#Requested move. —  AjaxSmack  06:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

This article is almost exclusively US - although the references are wider - and does not deal with war tax resistance, that is a form of resistance as civil disobedience rather than seeking legal provision for conscientious objection. The point about "bloated military spending" is that those who conscientiously object do regard military spending as "bloated" - in Britain where it absorbs resources that could be used for social ends as well as in the USA. User. Howard Clark 20 Jan 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard Clark (talk • contribs) 17:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)