Talk:Conqueror's Quest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novels
Literature Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments

This article is part of WikiProject Redwall, a WikiProject related to the Redwall universe. If you would like to participate, see the project page, where you can join the project, talk over new ideas, offer suggestions, and coordinate improvements.

Hey, great article there, but you might want to go a bit morein detail. btw; who made this? your RCQ name i mean. this is Griemont

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conqueror%27s_Quest&action=history Check history, it's all there. Dandin1 16:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh. Hiya dandin. Two q's. First, aren't there other, anonymouse (sorry, couldn't help it) testers like martin? also, do you mind if I add a "history of the RCQ" section? i take it, by the fact that you have a username here, that you'd be able to determine whether or not that sort fo thing would be appropriate.

Also, do you think the portion I added is acceptable accordign to standards? I plan to make a large contribution to this apge, so inform me of my mistakes pre-emptively.

Contents

[edit] It's griemont again

should i add in the atk/def values of the units and add their names? i'm assuming that you might have had a reason for omitting those.

We really wouldn't need those, that's why I used general names such as defensive and offensive specialist. This is Alvin of Firewall by the way. Alvin6226 03:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] the picture

I was goign to upload another picture, but im not a user, so can you do this? I'm saying because you can see alvin's whole computer desktop, including the IMs of some friends, and this may be construed as a privacy issue. So just cut everything out, except for the page itself though.

That would be greatly appreciated >_>. Alvin6226 03:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

Many thanks for the recent improvements to this article. Removing the coverage of Friends of Firewall and their in-game campaign is a definite improvement. Unfortunately the article still does not meet the Wikipedia notability criteria. In particular it should meet this guideline. This article could be still deleted unless some evidence from reliable sources is introduced to show the game's notability. Thanks, Gwernol 11:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I think it could be very hard to actually have reliable sources for RCQ in the general Wikipedia sense, because it is not a widely publicized game. I think it would help to establish a clear method of organization for the article. It would help to know what would be appropriate. For instance should aspects of game-play, game mechanics, and possible strategies be addressed? Or would it be more appropriate to cover a basic overview including a history of the game? I think the most notable aspect and what qualifies it for a Wiki article is that it is the only true Redwall game since The Sword of Redwall project went down. Making it a unique contribution to the ROC. Anything cataloguing invidual players and alliances is in my opinion higly inappropriate and unnecessary. Alvin no one cares about FoF, and it isn't relative to Wikipedia. Cydrid, Ithildur, Salu, or myself would be far more relavant, and that still has no place. If this article deserves any space it should describe the game and why it relavant to the wider redwall online community.Gerbilkit 19:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RCQ wiki.JPG

Image:RCQ wiki.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)