Talk:Connecticut Route 229
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
I will review this article as I have time. Please be patient. Thanks! —Rob (talk) 18:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Kurumi nay not be a valid source for GA status - I will ask about it. Route Reclassification Act should be cited.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No pictures - any images of the road are useful, preferred, and probably required for GA status w/ respect to roads.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: