From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jr.Nylc is for six and seventh graders

Contents 1 Fair use rationale for Image:Cylc seal large.jpg 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Cylc cylc.gif 3 Source Needed and Concerns 4 Yahoo Answers 4.1 Online Forums Reliable?

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cylc seal large.jpg

Image:Cylc seal large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Cylc cylc.gif

Image:Cylc cylc.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Source Needed and Concerns

We need a source to confirm the claim (in edit history) on 2 October 2007 that CYLC was "bought" by Envision EMI, LLC. If this is true, this information is relevant to the article, and the Non-profit Org categorization needs to be removed.

On 18 May 2007, user "Cheesy Yeast," who was the creator of this article, removed as "irrelevant links" two links to Envision EMI, including mention of Envision's for-profit status. This supports the contention of the anonymous editor on 4 September 2007, who commented, "I believe this entry is primarily an advertisement..." Articles used for advertisement are not allowed on Wikipedia. In the

same vein, I have removed the call for testimonials in this discussion area. I am concerned about Envision employees reversing these changes. Brian wessels (talk) 04:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yahoo Answers

I noticed quite a few Yahoo Answers links and I don't think it's something that should be relied upon. Can anyone provide a more reliable source?--71.196.48.107 (talk) 19:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Online Forums Reliable?

I really don't think that these online forums should be considered a reliable source for the claims made. From what I read, they are simply the rantings and opinions of several people that apparently don't have any sources to their claims. Therefore I am going to delete that entry unless valid sources are provided.--Brad M. (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)