Talk:Conflict: Middle East Political Simulator
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
|
Strategy games To-do:
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
I have just started programming a remake called Conflict.Net (http://www.senygaard.com/index.php?page=./pages/conflict_net.php)
Hi David, I (mail@senygaard.com) don't have your email address so I have to write to you here. I just was wondering if it was possible to send you a few questions about your role in the design of the original confMEPS? It won't be a long interview (many questions). I'd be happy if you found the time.
SEN
Contents |
[edit] South Africa
I have removed the (South Africa) from the Private Arms Dealer statement because there is nothing in the game to suggest the arms dealer represents the South African government or military, his accent aside, and the military equipment offered by the private dealer is of Soviet, not South African origin. To clarify further, the way the sentence was structured previously implies the private arms dealers are selling South African weaponry on behalf of South Africa, which is contrary to the nature of a "private" arms dealer, in addition to the specific weaponry not being used by the South African military. --NEMT 19:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- In the game it says (as you noted) that the seller has a South African accent. I have edited to reflect this. // Liftarn
[edit] Military - T-62 price
The text claims that
- "Weapon types are identical as far as war is concerned, regardless of their price: so the 1M USD T-62 Main Battle Tank from the private dealer is exactly the same as the 2M USD M1A1 Main Battle Tank from the USA."
As far as I can see the price of th T-62 Main Battle Tank from the private dealer is 2M USD, not 1M USD as stated in the article. Does anybody else have similar experience or experience as in the article? Perhaps matter of different versions. I am refering to the abandonware version for PC.
The "light tanks" do in fact cost 1M USD. How these compare in battle to the 2M tanks is unclear to me. --212.242.146.114 13:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
The line that mentioned the Private Arms dealer as a South African arms dealer was "with the private dealer (a South African national in the game) providing access to Russian weaponry.)"
I can kinda see the confusion here, however, private arms dealers would have to be sponsored by a government. I think mentioning that the Private Arms dealer is a pretty interesting note. Would there be a way to change the quote while removing the idea that he is providing Russian weaponry by a South African government?
- edit* I have gone ahead and restructured the sentence to sound better.
- Klasanov
[edit] Pictures of arms?
I seem to recall that under the DOS version, a picture is displayed of the arms being purchased. Sometimes, it is not shown. Any ideas why and if there a different versions, maybe we should put a reference. 66.191.19.217 03:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I thought the Amiga version had pictures, but the DOS version does not. // Liftarn
-
- I believe DOS had pictures to. There are data files with the names of the various arms in the DOS ver. 66.191.19.217 04:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Conflictscreenshot.gif
Image:Conflictscreenshot.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
