Talk:Confederate Monument of Bowling Green
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Lithography
The phrasing of "A lithograph of a painting popular in the Reconstruction-South, Henry Mosler's "Lost Cause", which typified the devastation Northern invaders inflicted upon Southern homesteads, was placed on the front of the monument. Different reliefs are on other sides of the monument" concerns me, as it implies that the lithograph was an original part ofthe monument. However, if the monument was erected in 1876, and lithography was invented in 1890, then it's not a lithograph, or it's not original. Has anyone got any thoughts on this? Geoffrey Pruitt (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- My history specialty is U.S History prior to 1877, so I'm not totally up on the history of lithographs. Maybe it was an early form of lithograph, before they were called as such.--Bedford 18:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Start-Class Kentucky articles | Mid-importance Kentucky articles | Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles | Military history articles with incomplete B-Class checklists | American Civil War task force articles | Start-Class military history articles | Wikipedia Did you know articles