Talk:Concordia College, Adelaide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Malvern Gorilla.png
Image:Malvern Gorilla.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ConcordiaLogo.gif
Image:ConcordiaLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Problem was addressed by User:MBisanz 18:31, 18 February 2008 (adding FUR using FURME)
[edit] Revamp March 2008
User talk:Loopla has significantly improved the article, however:
- Minor problem - Yrs 7-10 inclusive follow the IBMYP. To say "students from Year 10 follow the curriculum mandated by the Senior Secondary Assessment Board of South Australia" is not correct. (Yes, I know, it doesn't quite say that.) I'm considering presenting Yr 10 separately from Yr 11-12. Anyone have any thoughts on the matter?
- I think it's necessary to say something about SA secondary being Yr 8-12, and Concordia's addition of yr7 is new (less than 5 years ago) and although not unusual, is not common practice in SA. (yet!)
Pdfpdf (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Concordia pictures
Looking at Image:ConcordiaCollege1905.jpg and Image:ConcordiaGym1921.jpg, I question whether the 1921 photo is of the same building.
Regarding the 1905 picture, that building was constructed in the 19th century (see Annesley College), and was well established by 1905. The left wing (the photographer is looking south, so it is the east wing) was either built before, or at the same time as, the west wing, and the old Chapel is to the east of that. I'm not sure when the old chapel (now called the Suaviter) was built, but it was well before 1921.
Ignoring the east wing, if you look closely at the two photos, you can see significant differences between them. Is the 1905 picture a photo or a drawing? If it's a drawing, that could explain the differences, (but not the east wing!)
Comments? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)