Conquest of Space
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Conquest of Space | |
|---|---|
 DVD cover |
|
| Directed by | Byron Haskin |
| Produced by | George Pal |
| Starring | Walter Brooke Eric Fleming Mickey Shaughnessy |
| Distributed by | Paramount Pictures |
| Release date(s) | April 20, 1955 (U.S. release) |
| Running time | 81 min. |
| Language | English |
| Allmovie profile | |
| IMDb profile | |
Conquest of Space is a 1955 science fiction movie produced by George Pál which depicts a voyage to Mars. The science and technology were intended to be as realistic as possible. The poster tagline was "See how it will happen in your lifetime!"
Contents |
[edit] Background and sources
Conquest of Space was based on The Conquest of Space, a non-fiction 1949 book illustrated by Chesley Bonestell and written by Willy Ley. Bonestell is noted for his photorealistic paintings of views from outer space. The film also incorporated material from Wernher von Braun's 1952 book The Mars Project. The two books are straight popular science, with no story line. Except for their speculative element, they are nonfiction.
Had Pál followed either book, he would have produced a documentary, much like some of the Disney Tomorrowland television episodes featuring von Braun. Instead, writers Philip Yordan, Barré Lyndon and George Worthing Yates created a story out of whole cloth.
[edit] Plot summary
 |
Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
As a space crew approach Mars, the general becomes increasingly disturbed, and as they come in for a landing and the "space speed indicator" approaches zero, he suddenly says "We haven't the right!" and puts on full throttle. The captain, his son, struggles with him, wrenches his hand from the throttle, and brings the ship in to a rough but safe landing. The general makes a further sabotage attempt. In a fight with his son they struggle for a gun and it goes off, killing the general.
The crew discovers, apparently to their surprise, that Mars is inhospitable and that that it is going to be a severe struggle to survive with their limited water for the year it will take for Earth to reach the right orbital position for a successful return. Despite the absence of water on Mars, like the child in Ruth Krauss's book The Carrot Seed, Japanese crew member Sgt. Imoto plants a seed hopefully in the Martian soil.
The crew celebrates Christmas on Mars glumly. Wisecracking Brooklynite Sgt. Siegle plays Christmas carols somberly on a harmonica while the other actors chew the scenery. Siegle complains they are on "a lousy, dried-up ball in the corner pocket of nowhere."
- Sgt. Mahoney: The General wasn't crazy, he was right! We asked for it! There's a curse on this ship and everybody in it!
- Sgt. Siegle: Baloney! You leave that stuff back on Earth. But it don't operate past the thousand-mile limit. "Only God can make a tree." Okay? Where is it? Where's the trees, and the flowers, and the grass? Where's the water? You hear me? Where's the water?!
Just then, Sgt. Imoto, who has been staring out the window yells "Look!" It is snowing! On Christmas day! The crew is saved. In due course the seed Imoto planted sprouts into a tiny flower. The viewer infers Mars has water and can grow flowers; "only God can make a tree," therefore God is present on Mars; therefore God must intend for humankind to exploit not only the Earth, but Mars and the rest of the universe.
As the movie closes, Sgt. Mahoney, who had threatened to accuse Capt. Merritt of murdering his own father on their return, changes his mind and decides that it would be better to forget about it, and let the world remember the general, not as a nutcase who tried to sabotage the flight, but as a brave man "sacrificin' his life as he did, to bring his ship and his crew safely to a landing on the rocky desert of a new planet! … Fittin' end for a grand soldier." The captain nods and adds, "For the man who conquered space." The Irishman offers him "a cup o' tea", the captains says "thanks", the music rises to a climax, and the rocket glides off into a starry firmament behind the words "THE END."
[edit] Critical reception
Upon the movie's release, the New York Times' said "There is very little doubt who should receive a generous amount of credit and praise… They are the special effects artists, John P. Fulton, Irmin Roberts, Paul Lerpae, Ivyle Burks, and Jan Domela… They created top-flight effects such as 'the wheel', a self-contained station orbiting around earth, rocket flights in space and a horrendous near-collision with an asteroid. These facets of the Paramount production—and fortunately they are many and frequent—are much to marvel at. But then," it says ominously, "there is a story."
Judgements of the quality of the special effects vary. As noted above, contemporary reviewers were thrilled. Today's audiences are apt to notice the presence of visible matte lines. Reviewer Glenn Erickson says that "the ambitious special effects were some of the first to garner jeers for their lack of realism." Paul Brenner says "Pal pulls out all stops in the special effects department, creating 'The Wheel', rocket launches into space, and a breathtaking near collision with an asteroid." The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction says "The special effects are quite ambitious but clumsily executed, in particular the matte work." Paul Corupe says that often "the overall image on screen that inspires awe: the Martian landscape, the general's high-tech office and the vastness of the cosmos. The film's budget is certainly up on screen for your entertainment, but it's just spectacle for spectacle's sake." He too complains of matte lines but acknowledges that "the composites are convincing enough for the time the film was made in."
The film contains a single moment in which weightlessness is depicted convincingly, in which a visitor transferring from Earth shuttle rocket to space station tumbles head over heels through space, as well as comically bad efforts by actors to mime weightlessness or G-force. A space-eye view of a rocket climbing toward the viewer as it leaves Mars is impressive. While the effects do not brook comparison with those in 2001: A Space Odyssey, there are detectable similarities in overall "look" of the space scenes.
But as The Times says, "there is a story", and one that has come in for almost universal disparagement.
The best the Times reviewer could say is that "as plots go… it is not offensive." He is relieved that there is "nothing on Mars but red dirt and rock. There are no things, thank heavens." But "To have the water-less spacemen saved on Mars by a heavy snowfall on Christmas day was stepping on the toes of incredulity." The "spatial excursion should not bore anyone," he says; not high praise. The public was even less kind. Erickson calls the movie "a flop that seriously hindered George Pal's career as a producer." Corupe describes it as the "first big flop in Pal's career. It was a major setback that saw him abandon science fiction filmmaking for five years, including a planned sequel to When Worlds Collide." The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction remarks "A truly awful film, The Conquest of Space is probably George Pal's worst production."
[edit] Space conquest as blasphemy
The central theme of Conquest of Space probably reflects a controversy of the early 1940s. By the time the film was produced, this controversy was so utterly outdated that audiences were baffled. The British Interplanetary Society, founded in 1933, was perhaps the earliest space advocacy group, promoting the then-fantastic notion that space flight via rockets was technically feasible and that it ought to be attempted. Their ideas found opposition from a number of intellectual British Christians, notably C. S. Lewis. He wrote three books, superficially in the science-fiction/fantasy genre, intended to counter the views of the British scientific establishment.
In Perelandra (1943), a fictional account of a trip to Venus, Lewis referred to "the vast astronomic distances which are God's quarantine regulations". Lewis believed that God intended humankind to stay on Earth, and that attempts to leave it were blasphemous. He thought that the very word "Space" was wrong, charged with the notion of emptiness, and maintained that it should be thought of as "Heaven", inhabited by higher beings which, in his fantasy novels, he calls by names other than "God" or "angels". In the 1940s and 1950s it was common to justify spaceflight as a parallel to the great sea voyages that led to colonization: a means of finding fresh territory, literal "new worlds", more living space for humanity, and, of course, a source of valuable raw materials (like the "asteroid mines" of science fiction). Lewis was outraged by the idea that humankind, having overexploited the Earth, would proceed to colonize and overexploit the rest of the universe.
Pál's adapters present a dramatic controversy that closely parallels the Clarke-Lewis debate. The overarching story turns, in fact, on the question of whether or not God has given humankind no more than the Earth, or whether God has also given humankind Mars and the rest of the universe.
En route to Mars, Captain Barney Merritt, son of mission commander General Samuel Merritt, spots the general reading a Bible.
- Gen. Sam Merritt: Man's every move, his every thought, his every action is in there somewhere, recorded or predicted. Every move except… this one. According to the Bible, Man was created on the Earth. Nothing is ever mentioned of his going to other planets. Not one blessed word.
- Capt. Barney Merritt: Well, at the time the Bible was written, it wouldn't have made much sense, would it?
- Sam: Does it now? The Biblical limitations of Man's wanderings are set down as being the four corners of the Earth. Not Mars, or Jupiter, or infinity. The question is, Barney, what are we? Explorers? Or invaders?
- Barney: Invaders? Of what, sir?
- Sam: The sacred domain of God. His heavens. To Man, God gave the Earth — nothing else. This taking of… of other planets… it's almost like an act of blasphemy.
- Barney: But why? They belong to no one else.
- Sam: Huh. We don't know that.
- Barney: But look, sir. It couldn't be just an accident that, at the very time when Man's resources on Earth are reaching an end, Man develops the ability to leave his own world and seek replenishment on other planets. The timing is what fascinates me. It's too perfect to be accidental.
- Sam: Those other planets might already be tenanted.
- Barney: Oh, I don't think so. The universe was put here for Man to conquer.
If the theological debate on the Man's right to explore space had ever made much impression on the public, by 1955 it was long forgotten. The general did not strike viewers as thoughtful, but as a nutcase with a bizarre obsession.
[edit] References
- Bonestell, Chesley and Willy Ley, The Conquest of Space, New York: Viking, 1949.
- Clarke, Arthur C., and Lewis, C. S. From Narnia to a Space Odyssey: The War of Letters Between Arthur C. Clarke and C.S. Lewis, 2003. ISBN 0-7434-7518-6.
- "Special Effects Show Conquest of Space", New York Times May 28, 1955 p. 7; review by "O. A. G."
[edit] External links
