User talk:Composite superman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:CompositeMan02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CompositeMan02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Composite Man

ok just because i typed liek this here doesnt show shti abotu how i really type cause if im not typign to a guy liek you justso you wotn shut the fuck up and stop acting like your the worlds greatest typer which im sure your not so ill keep typign lik this and also i how the fuck do you expect me to post my info if you keep gettign rid of everything so im definitly gonna put my shit back up and put pages where i got my shit from so shut the fuck and and correct your fukign grammtical erroes cause you got worst then mine

You still seem to be intent on getting 'your way' on the page, despite it's errors in format, style, and grammar. I suggest you read this essay :WP:OWN, and learn a little about Wikipedia. Thank You. ThuranX 16:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
What part of this situation do you NOT understand? Your version of the page has unneeded sectioning, poor grammar, and isn't in compliance with section of wikipedia's style. FURTHER, You keep removing a Merge Template, which is strictly against Wikipedia Policy. Stope removing the tag. ThuranX 21:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

o you dont understand that im not doing a damn thing wrong andjust doing this for no reason sl keep reposting it tyou apologize faying that shit ealier and stop getting rid of it

You ARE doing something wrong. You are repeatedly removing the article merge tag. You are refusing to understand how Wikipedia works, and now you are attempting to vandalize my user talk page. ThuranX 23:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


no think o it this way im doing all that same shit youve been doing to me okay also ill let them merge if youd stop getting rid of my stff and apologize and get rid of that shit tryna get rid of my page and also go to hell

removing the Article Merge tag is vandalism. Now you know. ThuranX 14:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

doesnt matter all you do is isnsult me when i didnt do a songle thing wrong okay so its all your fault

NO, it is your fault. You have ignored every attempt I've made to help you learn how to use Wikipedia. I've given you links to all sorts of policy articles here, told you how to fix the article, and so on. You continue to insist that the way you've written the article is the way it must stay forever. You do not listen. You do not care. You seem to think the articles is YOURS. It's not. It's on Wikipedia. Others can edit it. Others, have, do, and WILL continue to edit it. You will not be able to revert forever. There are rules against it. I have rewritten the article to be more readily readable, to conform to wikipedia's standards, and the standards of the Wikiproject comics, and you still revert. Do you NOT understand that what I am doing is IMPROVING the article? You can't even spell 'Saturn Girl' correctly, yet when people fix it, you revert that too. Your behaviro makes it nearly impossible to assume good faith about your edits. You really need to look at all the other comic book articles on Wikipedia, and see how much better your article can be if you let others help you. ThuranX 15:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


hey you dumb bitch if i cant spell saturn girl well then why does the link lead to her page so fuck you and i can improve it and i will allow others ot improve it so get a fuckign life instead of thinkign your doing somethign good when youve never done anythign good ok your spellign sucks just as bad as the next o you wouldnt waste so much time on micrsoft trying to fix your so its your fuckign fault instead of being a man and asign you say my spellign is as bad your your piece of shit gradnman so fuck you and ill fix it up forever

[edit] Image:Composite man03.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Composite man03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ThuranX 03:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Dls-047.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dls-047.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ThuranX 21:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


listen stupid wiki is basically stealing my stuff if you keep doign that and i am liable to sue if i wanted so either you get some one else from some where else to get you your info or you take my info they way i put it

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for page blanking and legal threats. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by replying here on your talk page, by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

-- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "because wikipedia has tried to steal my information and use it for there self"

Decline reason: "You are now indefinitely blocked for making legal threats below. -- Sandstein 20:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

thats my info not you guys if it is then i wouldnt have made so you cant steal anythign that i have for info get you own i will sue every oen of you for fraud and stealing

If you submitted information to Wikipedia, you've licensed it under the GFDL, as with all contributions to Wikipedia -- while I generally prefer to keep these things amicable, the fact of the matter is that this license is irrevocable (as stated next to the "save change" button), and it would very probably be unfair to delete this content when numerous other people have also put their own time and effort into improving it, wouldn't you say? – Luna Santin (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

that dumbass you got there didnt improve anythign all he did was try and steal my work and block my from it because hekept sayign i had fake stuff which all came from other places and wiki its self so you tell him to go to hell

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Composite man.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Composite man.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)