Talk:Compulsory Basic Training

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the UK Roads WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the UK's road network. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

The concept Compulsory Basic Training is not specific to motorbike training. I suggest this topic is expanded or renamed at lease to reflect the motorbike nature.61.9.212.224 06:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Dean

[edit] Begin Motorcycling.co.uk

I have added this very informative free reference site, please feel free to discuss if you think it was a bad move195.171.111.194 11:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Category A2 (not A1) Practical Test Pass (Not Direct/Accelerated Access)

Hello,

Is anyone aware of what Information Code is used by the DVLA on a Full Driving Licence to show that the licence holder's Category A licence is restricted to Motorcycles up to 25kW(33bhp) and a power to weight ratio not exceeding 0.16kW/kg or a Motorcycle combination with a power to weight ratio not exceeding 0.16kW/kg for 2 years?

(Example: Passing a Practical Test in a vehicle with automatic transmission will result in an Information Code "78" being denoterd in the Code section of the Full Driving Licence) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rplyons (talk • contribs) 13:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikibook Project: Open-version highway code

As a sub-project of mine, as another hobby I would like to ask if any others who have passed their CBT, Direct Access and Driving licenses if they would like to contribute towards a pinpoint-accurate-referenced version of the highway code, and perhaps if popular enough open replacements for driving test related books for other countries. Of course, I will be e-mailing the DSA and others to see if anyone there would be willing to review the book for legal accuracy before it is considered a "complete" project. For anyone that is interested, please leave comments below rather than on my talk page. J O R D A N ^[talk ] 02:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)