Talk:Comparison of photo gallery software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 PhotoPost? 2 feature list 3 Photo Project 4 Moving this page 5 Only PHP? 6 Definition

[edit] PhotoPost?

Unsure if the omission was intentional, but I don't see PhotoPost (http://www.photopost.com/)) listed. - Ageekgal 09:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] feature list

As of july 2006, there is Name, License, OS, Platform, Languages and Thumbnails. I think that OS is irrelevant because all are web-based; Thumbnails should be detail. I thought adding features like uplad, output, and so on, could beuseful. -Marc Lacoste 10:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, the "thumbnails" note on 4images is effectively meaningless, given that all the featured projects offer support for thumbnails. What would be more interesting is seeing which perform thumbnail creation automatically, which cache them, etc. However, if all of them (as I suspect) use ImageMagik and cache the result, there's no reason to bother enumerating it here. MrZaius^talk 17:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photo Project

I have started an Artical on the Photo software SkippyUK 12:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving this page

The correct title of this article should be Comparison of photo gallery software -- Gudeldar 14:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Only PHP?

There aren't only PHP based engines. I know about at least on Perl base image [[1]]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaclav Haisman (talk • contribs) 17:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Definition

There should be a definition for "photo gallery software" or a link to the not yet existing article photo gallery software. --X-Bert (talk) 23:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)