Talk:Comparative responsibility
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] comparative responsibility
I started this page a few days ago, I'm working on it slowly. I hope to include more links and references and polish the organization of the page over the next few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mendelson (talk • contribs)
[edit] ==
This page should be taken with a grain of salt and contrasted with others defining the terms used as there is apparent inconsistency. Further, the whole idea of comparing fault between an intentional tortfeasor and a negligent plaintiff creates the very misleading impression that such an extraordinary case arises with some frequency. A citation to a real case would be helpful. In fact, the frequency of such cases is negligible [pun unintentional] and I think the whole subject is better explained on the page on comparative negligence.
--Yehhbut 16:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
