Talk:Communists for Kerry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Political parties, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of political parties-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to "featured" and "good article" standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. [View this template] |
| Portal | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
The group highlights a less-publicized incident in which The Washington Times reported of an anti-Bush protest, "Kerry might prefer to eschew the four-member "Communists for Kerry" contingent, whose placards advocated a "France First!" foreign policy." KommanderDjin comments on the group's web site, "Do note that this article received zero mention from the leftists out there, while the mistake made by FoxNews, is cause to dismantle the entire news organization"
- I don't understand. The link doesn't point to anything about a Washington Times article. Also, if this is a complaint, it's an odd one, since both Fox & the Times are generally viewed as having right-wing bias. Can you clarify the intent of this addition? Wolfman 04:40, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
-
- The link is part of the original quote. At least skim the web site. Besides, it turns out it was The Washington Post, and I've corrected it now. - Calmypal 17:06, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Just so you know, the group has NOT collapsed or disbanded. The CFK site has been turned into the "museum of the failed revolution" and most of the group has gone into a new site called the People's Cube. You may not know this because Google has banned it from its search dictionary, but type in google :The Peoples Cube (without the apostraphe) and you should get there. If not, than non-google search engines should turn it up. ELV
- The link is part of the original quote. At least skim the web site. Besides, it turns out it was The Washington Post, and I've corrected it now. - Calmypal 17:06, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
-
-
-
- They did for awhile, but this seems to have been corrected. Rogue 9 06:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I put an external link to their new site below the article, lest anyone be confused as to what happened to them. Ruthfulbarbarity 01:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
