Talk:Comedy Central's Indecision 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TV This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by Wikipedia:WikiProject Television because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{TelevisionWikiProject}} template, removing the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Midterm Midtacular

"Unlike the previous "Indecision" specials, presented only by The Daily Show"... Doesn't the Midterm Midtacular count as an Indecision 2006 special? I mention this because that show was a joint venture between TDS and TCR, which would make the previous statement incorrect. Shoemoney2night 06:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge notice

I'm new to the whole wiki thing so I'm not sure how this would work or what the best policy is, but it seems to me that - if the "Indecision 200x" stuff is going to be covered at all, which for an encyclopedia seems questionable - there should be one comprehensive article covering the changes over time and impact of the overall series. Such a condensed article could merit standing on its own feet, which is why I didn't resort to deletion. Halond 21:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I think each article stands on its own because the media coverage is distinct and limited to an election cycle. Merging all of them into one article doesn't make much sense because of how much the coverage changed from iteration to iteration. --William Graham talk 22:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree that a single article makes little sense, and as this is a current news item it wouldn't make sense to merge this one even if 2004, 2000, etc... were merged. Adam McCormick 01:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)