Talk:Combinational logic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 11:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Curious, is there any authority as to whether "combinational" or "combinatorial" is the preferred term?
[edit] Requested move
- Combinatorial logic → Combinational logic … Rationale: More standard term in literature, more frequent term in common use, and to avoid confusion with "Combinatory logic", a different subject … Please share your opinion at Talk:Combinatorial logic. Jon Awbrey 15:34, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support. "Combinational logic" is the term of choice in all of the textbooks and other literature known to me, it beats the alternative 4 to 1 on Google, and it averts confusion with Combinatory logic, which is sometimes also referred to as "Combinatorial logic". Jon Awbrey 15:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support I would actually move Combinatory logic, too. Combinatorial logic is the primary name for it. Septentrionalis 23:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
