Complex cobordism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, complex cobordism is a generalized cohomology theory related to cobordism of manifolds. Its spectrum is denoted by MU. It is an exceptionally powerful cohomology theory, but can be quite hard to compute, so often instead of using it directly one uses some slightly weaker theories derived from it, such as Brown-Peterson cohomology or Morava K-theory, that are easier to compute.
Contents |
[edit] Spectrum of complex cobordism
The complex bordism MU*(X) of a space X is roughly the group of bordism classes of stably complex manifolds over X, where "stably complex" means there is a complex linear structure on the stable normal bundle. Complex bordism is a generalized homology theory, corresponding to a spectrum MU that can be described explicitly in terms of Thom spaces as follows.
The space MU(n) is the Thom space of the universal n-plane bundle over the classifying space BU(n) of the unitary group U(n). The natural inclusion from U(n) into U(n+1) induces a map from the double suspension S2MU(n) to MU(n+1). Together these maps give the spectrum MU.
[edit] Formal group laws
Milnor (1960) and Novikov (1960, 1962) showed that the coefficient ring π*(MU) (equal to the complex cobordism of a point, or equivalently the ring of cobordism classes of stably complex manifolds) is a polynomial ring Z[x1, x2,...] on infinitely many generators xi ∈ π2i(MU) of positive even degrees.
Write CP∞ for infinite dimensional complex projective space, which is the classifying space for complex line bundles, so that tensor product of line bundles induces a map μ:CP∞× CP∞ → CP∞. A complex orientation on an associative commutative ring spectrum E is an element x in E2(CP∞) whose restriction to E2(CP1) is 1, if the latter ring is identified with the coefficient ring of E. A spectrum E with such an element x is called a complex oriented ring spectrum.
If E is a complex oriented ring spectrum, then
and μ*(x) ∈ E*(point)[[x⊗1, 1⊗x]] is a formal group law over the ring E*(point) = π*(E).
Complex cobordism has a natural complex orientation. Quillen (1969) showed that there is a natural isomorphism from its coefficient ring to Lazard's universal ring, making the formal group law of complex cobordism into the universal formal group law. In other words, for any formal group law F over any commutative ring R, there is a unique ring homomorphism from MU*(point) to R such that F is the pullback of the formal group law of complex cobordism.
[edit] Brown-Peterson cohomology
Complex cobordism over the rationals can be reduced to ordinary cohomology over the rationals, so the main interest is in the torsion of complex cobordism. It is often easier to study the torsion one prime at a time by localizing MU at a prime p; roughly speaking this means one kills off torsion prime to p. The localization MUp of MU at a prime p splits as a sum of suspensions of a simpler cohomology theory called Brown-Peterson cohomology, first described by Brown & Peterson (1966). In practice one often does calculations with Brown-Peterson cohomology rather than with complex cobordism. Knowledge of the Brown-Peterson cohomologies of a space for all primes p is roughly equivalent to knowledge of its complex cobordism.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- Adams, J.F. (1974), Stable homotopy and generalised homology, University of Chicago Press
- Brown, Edgar H., Jr. & Peterson, Franklin P. (1966), “A spectrum whose Zp cohomology is the algebra of reduced pth powers.”, Topology 5: 149--154, MR0192494, DOI 10.1016/0040-9383(66)90015-2.
- Conner, E. E. & Floyd (1966), The relation of cobordism to K-theories, vol. 28, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag, MR0216511, DOI 10.1007/BFb0071091isbn=978-3-540-03610-4
- Milnor, J. (1960), “On the Cobordism Ring Ω∗ and a Complex Analogue, Part I”, American Journal of Mathematics 82 (3): 505-521, <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9327%28196007%2982%3A3%3C505%3AOTCRAA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C>
- Novikov, S. P. (1960), “Some problems in the topology of manifolds connected with the theory of Thom spaces”, Soviet Math. Dokl. 1: 717-720, MR0121815
- Novikov, S. P. (1962), “Homotopy properties of Thom complexes. (Russian)”, Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 57: 407-442, MR0157381
- Quillen, Daniel (1969), “On the formal group laws of unoriented and complex cobordism theory”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 75: 1293-1298, MR0253350, <http://www.ams.org/bull/1969-75-06/S0002-9904-1969-12398-0/S0002-9904-1969-12398-0.pdf>.
- Ravenel, Douglas C. (1988), “Complex cobordism theory for number theorists”, Elliptic Curves and Modular Forms in Algebraic Topology, vol. 1326, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 123-133, ISBN 978-3-540-19490-3, ISSN 1617-9692, DOI 10.1007/BFb0078042
- Ravenel, Douglas C. (2003), Complex cobordism and stable homotopy groups of spheres (2nd ed.), AMS Chelsea, MR0860042, ISBN 978-0-8218-2967-7, <http://www.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/mu.html>
- Yu.B. Rudyak (2001), “Cobordism”, in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1556080104
- Stong, R.E. (1968), Notes on cobordism theory, Princeton University Press
- Thom, René (1954), “Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables”, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 28: 17-86, MR0061823, <http://retro.seals.ch/digbib/view?did=c1:389597&sdid=c1:389960>