Wikipedia:Collaborations of the Week/Lipovans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Lipovans

Nominated on 22:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC); needs 6 votes by April 28,2006.

Very interesting ethnic group deserves to be more about it. European only rural Russian minority outside former Soviet Union.

Support:

  1. Luka Jačov 22:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. estavisti 22:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. serbiana - talk 22:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. --Jovanvb 22:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. --Elephantus 22:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  6. RexNL 10:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  7. --GTubio 11:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  8. SpeedyGonsales 14:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  9. PANONIAN (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  10. Filip (§) 15:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  11. --HolyRomanEmperor 16:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  12. — SasaStefanovic • 20:34 15-04-2006
  13. --VKokielov 21:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  14. -- Obradović Goran (talk 13:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  15. Avala 16:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Very interesting ethnic group deserves to be more about it.
I'm not sure if this sentence means anything... --HolyRomanEmperor 16:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  • It's Belgrade from AID (45 votes in one week) all over again! I don't think that's a bad thing -- we can all learn from such superior get-out-the-vote campaigns. -Scottwiki 08:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Sure, as long as there's no competition - like here. Almost everywhere else -- in particular, on AfDs -- it looks like someone's been gathering votes, and everyone else listened. I'm concerned about the reputation of the community. --VKokielov 17:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
  • This nomination appears to be the winner. I believe that it should be posted as the current collaboration. (I'd post it myself -- but I've made newbie mistakes when doing such things recently.) -Scottwiki 14:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Ah, heck, I'll do it. I'll make sure to follow the instructions.  :-) -Scottwiki 04:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
      • Done. -Scottwiki 05:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

The week is now half over and only two small changes have been made to this COTW. Why aren't the people who nominated it making improvements? --EncycloPetey 02:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Because it is a fraud, of course. Because the nominator expects every other one of us to work, and none of us (of course) have any intention to work, since the nominator solicited our votes.
See [1]. --VKokielov 13:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)