Wikipedia:Collaborations of the Week/Fauna (animals)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Fauna (animals)

Nominated on 10:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC); needs 15 votes by May 8, 2006.

Browsing again through the most wanted stubs, I found this article, which pales next to the former stub flora (plants). One could argue that animal is the more important article on the topic. But still, I think that fauna should have its own substantial content.

Support:

  1. Scottwiki 10:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
  2. --HolyRomanEmperor 17:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
  3. Avala 17:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  4. St jimmy 14:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
  5. Rybka - Darwinek 16:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
  6. --Francisco Valverde 07:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
  7. Juan Scott 05:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  8. Yarnalgo 18:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
  9. Ross (ElCharismo) 14:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  10. Bobo is soft 20:15, April 12, 2006
  11. Jasu 17:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  12. IronChris | (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  13. AndyZ t 01:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Unbelievably short. Flora is not much better either.Avala 17:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I have nominated Flora (plants) as candidate to WP:AID. Both would be a wonderfull couplet of Feature articles.--Francisco Valverde 09:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Flora (plants) is a stub, just as much as this article is. It only seems otherwise because it's bloated by unnecessary lists. I strongly recommend nominating both flora and fauna for CotW (if both are successful, we could even do a dual-collab since they're related topics, much like we did for male and female a while back). -Silence 04:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Fauna (animals) is the winner. I recommend that this article be edited in tandem with fellow nominee Flora (plants) -- with more focus on Fauna, since it won. (Unfortunately, I probably won't have time to post Fauna as the winner, notify the voters, or do much work on the articles, since I'm taking classes and my final papers are due soon.) -Scottwiki 03:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)