User talk:Col. Hauler/Archive002

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Archive 001

Contents

[edit] Welcome

(just because the links are useful, thanks again Kylu) --Col. Hauler 22:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello Col. Hauler/Archive002, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing!  ♥ Kylu  (talk • contribs • email • logs • count)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical


[edit] Archived?

It took me half an hour to find the links to those archived WP:ANI discussions for you, and you archive without reply. That's nice for a guy who tells other people it would be more civil to discuss the issue. Bishonen | talk 22:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC).

copy-pasted[1]
Archiving for the first time and messing with the settings, no need to bite my head off for not responding "soon enough". Yes, okay, fine, I concede, have it your way, but I still think it's unnecessarily cruelty to someone who's already hard a hard enough time of it (have you read some of the messages on the talk page like "is there anyone out there please talk to me?" etc? It's pretty sad. --Col. Hauler 22:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Having just read your personal attack on SV

I have to ask: Have you considered looking into the actions of all the various blocked users that you are supporting? If you feel some kind of need to 'fight the power' there are plenty of issues on Wikipedia where one can legitimately discuss overuse of admin powers... But not any of the ones that you have been complaining about. MilesVorkosigan 22:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smile

[edit] User:Mistress Selina Kyle

Feel free to request the page be unprotected again, but I don't think it will be. There is clearly a revert war going on there. You are correct in that Dmcdevit should not have changed the page before protecting it. Doing so is a violation of the protection policy. However, if I were to unprotect it the revert war would continue, so it should not be unprotected. In fact unprotecting it to allow you to switch to the old version then re-protecting it would be a violation of the protection policy as well. I think that you should go with the consensus of the other editors and just leave the {{indefblocked}} template on the page. Happy editing!Prodego talk 16:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More smiles