Talk:Colloquy at Poissy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There seems to be little to support the Protestant POV, instead, more focus on Catholic embarrassment: ie. 'It was a deep humiliation for the proud Roman hierarchy of France to be compelled to listen to a long tirade by Beza against a cherished Catholic doctrine' Markabbott01 19:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). -- Ok, this was the boilerplate. Yes, the article is not WP:NPOV. That's because it's from a 1913 encyclopedia. It needs cleanup and sourcing. Sandstein 20:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

There are a number of highly prejudicial phrases in this document, such as referrring to one of the parties as insolent. And, I think it is original research to compare Queen Elizabeth I of Engalnd with Queen Catharine Medici of France. They, their powers and histories are regraded by most observers as different as chalk and cheese. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.145.81 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)