Talk:Coller Capital

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

[edit] Coller Capital

I have made some minor edits to the page. Changing the sum $4.5 billion to $4.8 billion as that is the correct size of the fund. I have also deleted references to Coller Capital being a fund of funds - it isn't. Finally I have deleted the section that as a dedicated secondaries investors we have limited ability to make new commitments ... affecting our desirability to financial sponsors etc as this simply isn't true. I hope this is acceptable. Many thanks. (George dd (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Coller Capital

Please note I have added this page back and have addressed some of your concerns about copyright issues and objectivity (please note this page was originally created several weeks ago and was not deleted until I made some revisions to remove controversial statements). I did not write the original article (it looks like it was done by an employee) but I think you will agree as written it should be acceptable. I have been working on making some changes to this article and would appreciate it if you would leave it as is. It is also challenging if you delete a page without warning (particularly since it was created several weeks ago) Thanks for your help Urbanrenewal (talk) 05:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lexington Partners

Please note you have now deleted two pages Coller Capital and Lexington Partners. I am not sure what the rationale you are using is as I am very clearly not advertising for all of these firms which compete against each other and I have corrected what you perceived as a copyright issue (that I did not create). They are notable firms (refer to some of the other firms listed in the Private Equity Firms category) and the writing is generally not biased, particularly when comparing one to another. I would appreciate it if you would undo what you have done and leave this group of articles for further review and comment which I believe would be more productive than deleting the pages altogether. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanrenewal (talk • contribs) 05:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)