Talk:College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Please cease deleting the truth about this College.
[edit] The doctors it has unfairly attacked over the years have been vindicated.
I find the quoted body of text confusing because it mixes quotes and italics. By the end of reading a long sentence in italics I've forgetten it's a quote and start thinking it's integrated into the main text of the especially small article. Without strongly isolating the "he saids" and "she saids" it borders on feeling like a violation of the neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia. I hope the original author can come back here and rewrite it as per the advice NPOV tutorial, because I'll forget to come back. I tried to find a relevant example in there for the poster, Accusations is the closest I can find. Nastajus 13:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] End of the College
Please explain why you have removed the section, "End of the College". It is completely accurate and from a neutral point of view. Are you a defender of the College?
Jerry Green, M.D.
[edit] Revert of "END OF COLLEGE"
I think a section criticism of the college could be created. The edits I reverted -- while addressing the issue need to be referenced (see WP:REF) and written from a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). Nephron T|C 08:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Significant changes
I've endevoured to NPOV the article. I think some criticism could be directed at the CPSO about alternative medicine; however, I don't think the reference that was there added anything nor did the section really explain the CPSO policy, i.e. the criticism was poorly direct and, IMHO, not well-informed. Nephron T|C 18:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)