Talk:Cold fusion/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello!, sorry for the long wait since your GA request. I will put it on hold since its taken so long and give you a chance to fix the problems.
- References aren't formatted properly, please see {{cite web}} on how to
- A lot of external links throughout the article first ones are found near reference 5, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics and the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
- Cold fusion is a nuclear fusion reaction that has been reported to occur near , "reported" reword that
- two nuclei are forced to join together to form a heavier nucleus. During the process, energy is released. sounds better
- By the mid-1990s, most governments and scientists had dismissed the concept as illusion. remove 'most'
- In 2003, about 200 scientists were contributing to the field or participating in , remove 'about'
- Still, its report said, many experiments were poorly documented,, poorly worded
That's jsut the lead so this article needs a good copy-edit. References are in the right spot, images are fine. I suggest you get another peer review or ask someone interested on the subject to perform a copy-edit. Please also read Tony's redudancy excersises as this article has a lot. M3tal H3ad 12:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Failed, no action taken. Feel-free to renominate for GA when issues are addressed but i strongly advise a peer review first. M3tal H3ad 01:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
