Talk:Cold Feet (series 1)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cold Feet (series 1) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on March 30, 2008.
May 15, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

Cold Feet (series 1) has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Comedy Portal This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is part of WikiProject British TV shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British TV shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project British TV shows, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 15, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: PASS

2. Factually accurate?: PASS

3. Broad in coverage?: PASS

4. Neutral point of view?: PASS

5. Article stability? PASS

6. Images?: PASS

Very well done. The article was easy to understand and very well sourced. I did some minor copyediting, but there weren't any major problems. A picture of one of the stars might be a good addition (instead of just a guest star) but sometimes those are hard to come by, and that doesn't keep me from passing the article. Great job! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Nikki311 20:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your review. There's a grainy picture of James Nesbitt and quite a good picture of Robert Bathurst, so I might squeeze that one in somewhere. Bradley0110 (talk) 09:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)