Talk:Colby Granger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Revelation of Colby as a double agent for Chinese

Does anyone else think that revealing that Colby was a double agent for the Chinese in the first line of the article is a bit too much of a spoiler? I totally get it being in the article, lower down as it is, but I think having it in the first line of the article is a bit much. There are people who are gonna read this before they see the Season 3 Finale (on DVD or reruns, etc) and though that number may be small, I think we still have to consider them. Comments? CyberTrini 16:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

You should at least place spoiler tags, in my opinion. For those who just began the season, it would prove to be a HUGE spoiler. HaikenEdge 19:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NUMB3RS 215 - The Running Man.jpg

Image:NUMB3RS 215 - The Running Man.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)