Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued March 27, 1991 Decided June 24, 1991 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: White Joined by: Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy Dissent by: Blackmun Joined by: Marshall, Souter Dissent by: Souter Joined by: Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor |
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., 501 U.S. 663 (1991)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that freedom of the press does not exempt journalists from generally applicable laws.
Dan Cohen, a Republican associated with Wheelock Whitney's 1982 Minnesota gubernatorial run, provided inculpatory information on the Democratic challenger for Lieutenant Governor, Marlene Johnson, to the Minneapolis Star Tribune in exchange for a promise that his identity as the source would not be published. Over the reporter's objections, an editor decided to publish his name. He consequently lost his job at an advertising agency. He sued Cowles Media Company who owned the newspaper.
In 1988, a jury of six found in Cohen's favor. The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed. The United States Supreme Court remanded the case to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which reinstated the jury's original verdict of $200,000.
[edit] See also
[edit] Further reading
- Rothenberg, Elliot C. (1999). The Taming of the Press: Cohen v. Cowles Media Company. Westport, CT: Praeger. ISBN 0275966011.
[edit] References
- ^ , full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.