Talk:COGIATI
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yes, I know it needs a lot of work. The criticisms are many and varied, and tie into criticisms of the tests it is based on. Too much thinking for me right now, though, so just getting the article into existence is enough for me now. Poechalkdust 09:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Criticism? Validation?
As this article currently stands, it needs a lot of work. There's no source indicating the test is actively used except Reitz herself, which is obviously not valid. There's a few third-party links, but there's no real meat to this piece. One of the links openly criticizes the test as non-valid, but it's just a link and not discussed in the piece, nor are any other criticisms or defense of the test really included here. I think this could be an improved article, so I hesitate to nominate it for deletion only because the potential alone makes it worth salvaging.Rebochan 20:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)