User talk:Coffeemaker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] INC arguments

I see that you and User:Emico are having difficulties with the INC article. Are you aware that he is currently the subject of a case by Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee? For more information about this and if you want to give your input about it, please check out his request for arbitration. --LBMixPro(Speak on it!) June 30, 2005 01:06 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding "Controversies" Part

This "Controversies Part" on the main article reports 12 INC members who were angered after a basketball game with PUP students. How could they represent the INC Religion? There are thousands of Non-INC's in Bilibid Prison or Muntinlupa...Isn't that enough to put "CONTROVERSIES" for their respective religions? You don't even know if these 12 are still INC's. May I request that the author edit that part? Readers can know if you are against INC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.118.218 (talk) 10:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] See also links in INC

  • With INC being an independent religious organization, how come there's a link to Protestants in the Philippines? Also, according to the sources section in the cult list, INC is in the "decreasing consensus" category, since INC wasn't called a cult in any major news source in the "Wide consensus" section. --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 10:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion

Hi, May I suggest you take a Reading Comprehension Instructional Strategies - Elementary Level Class. It would greatly benefit you. 202.69.192.4 Ionblue.

May I suggest you create a wikipedia account. It's easy. Why hiding behind a open proxy? Coffeemaker 10:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iglesia ni Cristo article.

Thanks for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. I hope you can help us out! Also, please don't disrupt the article just to prove a point. --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 20:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] INC WikiProject

I'm sending this to you as you've edited the Iglesia ni Cristo article substantially. As coverage of INC at Wikipedia continues to grow, and the need to make sure related articles are held at a high standard of Wikipedia article quality, I've proposed a new WikiProject dedicated to INC. If you're interested, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject/List_of_proposed_projects#WikiProject_Iglesia_ni_Cristo and sign your name. A temporary example of what the project page will look like is at my userspace. --LBMixPro <Speak|on|it!> 09:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iglesia ni Cristo

The Iglesia ni Cristo article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 05:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Politico-religious sect

Hi, your edit on Iglesia ni Cristo was reverted. If you want to discuss about this, let's go to the article's talk page. --Quess 02:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Iglesia ni Cristo

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Coffeemaker! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bnetwork54\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 02:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Regarding "Controversies" Part

This "Controversies Part" on the main article reports 12 INC members who were angered after a basketball game with PUP students. How could they represent the INC Religion? There are thousands of Non-INC's in Bilibid Prison or Muntinlupa...Isn't that enough to put "CONTROVERSIES" for their respective religions? You don't even know if these 12 are still INC's. May I request that the author edit that part? Readers can know if you are against INC.