Talk:Code (set theory)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] A definition easier to follow
There is probably nothing wrong in the article as it stands, but I want to change the beginning of it anyway. The reason is that I don't like when (for most people) nontrivial concepts are introduced in a single sentence and, in addition, the notation is introduced in nested "where-clauses" and "such-that-clauses"
I'll replace
-
- In set theory, a code for a set
-
-
- x
-
-
- the notation standing for the hereditarily countable sets,
-
- is a set
-
-
- E ω×ω
-
-
- such that there is an isomorphism between (ω,E) and (X,) where X is the transitive closure of {x}.
with this
-
- In set theory a code of a set is defined as follows. Let x be a hereditarily countable set, and let X be the transitive closure of {x}. Let as usual ω denote the set of natural numbers and let be the first uncountable cardinal number. In this notation we have . Also recall that denotes the relation of belonging in X.
- A code for x is any set E satisfying the following two properties:
- 1.) E ω×ω
- 2.) There is an isomorphism between (ω,E) and .
if there are no objections.
YohanN7 (talk) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)