From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is part of WikiProject Sharks, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on sharks. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Sharks. |
|
Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by the Sharks Wikiproject, if you are interested sign up on the project page:
- Copyedit/Formatting: Shark Trust, Jacques-Yves Cousteau, Hans Hass
- Expand: Shark threat display, Finback catshark, Slender smooth-hound, Proscylliidae, Galapagos shark (Carcharhinus galapagensis)
- Requests: Ron Taylor (diver) and Valerie Taylor (diver), John McCosker, Shark behaviour
- Stubs: Leonard Compagno, Eugenie Clark, Shark POD, Spinner shark (Carcharhinus brevipinna)
- Images: Upload any non-copyrighted shark images to Wikimedia Commons
- Featured Articles/Good Articles: Basking shark
- Patrol: Look through the Category:Sharks for recent changes
- Collaboration: The current Collaboration of the Fortnight is Great white shark
- Other: See the projects page
|
|
"reaches a length of 92 cm." vs "may possibly grow to 2 or 3 m."... is this an error, or due to conflicting reports, or do we really know this little about this fish? I wasn't sure from the article whether this was saying that there are some unconfirmed reports of them growing over a meter, or if it was a contradiction, or what. Does anyone have an additional reference (since the one listed just has the same vagueness)? -FZ 18:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- That is what fishbase states, it claims both, with two different references, so obviously we do not know much about this shark :-( --Stefan talk 12:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)