User:ClueBot III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user account is a bot operated by Cobi (talk).

It is not a sock puppet, but rather an automated or semi-automated account for making repetitive edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually.
Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please block it.


Emergency robot shutoff button


Administrators: Use this button if the bot is malfunctioning. (direct link)

Non-administrators can report misbehaving bots to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.



Bot Account
Bot
ClueBot III this user is a Bot
ClueBot III (Talk · Contribs)

ClueBot III aids in Operation Enduring Encyclopedia.
Operator: Cobi (t)
Approved? Yes, BRFA.
Flagged? Yes.
Task/s: Talk page archival.[1]
Edit rate: maxlag = 2
Edit period/s: Continually
Automatic or manual? Automatic
Programming language/s: PHP, my own code utilizing api.php, query.php, and index.php.
Exclusion compliant? Yes
Other information: ClueBot III is run from the ClueNet servers. According to User:StatusBot, ClueBot III is offline.

Contents
ClueBots
ClueBot/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script · ClueBot III/Archive
ClueBot IV/Open Proxy Clerk · ClueBot VI/WP:CHUU Clerk  · Talk
Cobi/Owner · Talk · Contributions

Documentation

Administrator emergency shutoff

Administrators may turn the bot off by changing this page to 'False'.

Exclusion compliant

This bot is an exclusion compliant bot.

How to archive your page

The general format for the archive template:

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=
|format=
|age=
|index=
}}

The archiveprefix parameter should be set to a subdirectory under the page you wish to archive. For example, if I were archiving User talk:Cobi, I would set it to User talk:Cobi/Archives/.

The format parameter should be set to a valid argument to PHP's date() function. This is the name of the archive page.

The age parameter should be set to the number of hours a thread can go without a reply before it should be archived.

The index parameter should be set to yes if you wish the bot to dump an index in place of the template. This is useful if you have wrapped the template with an {{archive box}}. Otherwise it should be set to no.

Example (without archive box)

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/
|format=Y/F
|age=72
|index=yes
}}

Example (with archive box)

{{Archive box|image=[[Image:Crystal Clear app file-manager.png]]
|{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/
|format=Y/F
|age=72
|index=yes
}}
}}


Awards

Show all awards

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For high-speed move reversals and drawing attention to a certain page-move vandal, I hereby award you this colorful barnstar. Grandmasterka 07:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Stop beating everybody to everything! — The Final Chronicler (talk) 05:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is the only warning you will receive for beating all of us. Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia with such vigor, as you did to Burn[1], you will indirectly block others from editing. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 04:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
The Atlas Award
ClueBot, thanks for all your speedy work in reverting vandalism! -- Quantockgoblin (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The Atlas Award - for being a great supporter of Wikipedia

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Man, you're REALLY fast! I had to give you this!  Barkjon  14:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For irritatingly quick reverting of vandalism! CycloneNimrod (talk? please?) 20:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Why do you have to be so fast? Every time I see vandalism, it's gone by the time I hit revert! Torchflame (talk) 23:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Why do you have to be so fast? Alexfusco5 12:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For repeatedly beating me (and everyone else) to vandalism, and because I'm not creative enough to think of a different Barnstar.  :) --Thinboy00 talk/contribs @74, i.e. 00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
The da Vinci Barnstar
Oh my...how did we survive without this? With MartinBot! Ha, just kidding, but nice work! You've inspired me to even learn PHP (not bots yet, but there is that svg maker... I do use ClueBot III too! Best bots ever! If I was a developer on the HRWiki, I'd try to bring it there. I know this was a long barnstar message, but this is just scratching the surface! Vandals don't stand a chance! Almighty bots! Soxred93 | talk bot 21:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


Praise

  • This Bot along with VoABot II are probably the two most useful bots that we have here on Wikipedia because they aid in one of the most important tasks here on Wikipedia, and that is keeping the encyclopedia mainspace free from vandalism. Hats off to Cobi for creating the bot :) !, --Mifter (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
  • thanks for fixing the vandalism on Harry Potter's article --Runesage106 (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • wow you are really all over the place.... Cherokee40 (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • This Bot's early contributions have been very much valued. Long may it continue! Lradrama 19:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Congrats on getting approved! LordKenTheGreat 01:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Finally, something else to help out MartinBot since AVbot died. Kwsn(Ni!) 21:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Great to again see an active bot beating me to a lot of the silly vandalism I've been dealing with. There goes my edit count! Tony Fox (arf!) 18:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Yo g, u numba 1 in da hood i give yo props. (Was that good gangsta talk?) (: Cheers, JetLover (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Thank you for reverting a page blanking at Steely Dan, which is on my watchlist. :-) --Tkynerd 18:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Fantastic support against vandals and mass deletion! Thank you, from a hard-working contributor.BatteryIncluded 11:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
  •  :-) —RuakhTALK 04:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Sweet bot. Very fast at reverting. I need to learn how to program bots....—Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 18:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Great bot, it does it all. The thing that really impresses me is the bot's ability to issue incremental warnings and report to AIV. Very well designed. --Bongwarrior 07:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Cluebot you rock :) Whenever I go to fix vandalism, your already there saving me the trouble! Million_Moments 17:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Not sure if I am posting this in the right spot, but thanks for fixing one of the articles I worked hard on hit by vandalism.FieldMarine 03:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks for helping out when I sorta went away into the void (the evils of university) -- Tawker 21:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Cluebot, you suck. You always freaking beat me. :) *Cremepuff222* 01:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • It appears you've driven MartinBot into extinction! Lradrama 17:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I have been able to beat this lightning quick bot to some reverts which it would consider destructive. But it's still as fast as a jaguar! Mister1nothing 16:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Bloody fantastic! You keep beating me to the reverts! Three cheers to your creator! -HamatoKameko 04:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Incredibly fast!! I have lost over 40 reverts to this bot. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 11:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Your Bot's real cool but I hate it because it always beats me to the edits!! Keep it up man! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjw212 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Most excellent! Not only do you instantaneously revert the vandalism, but you also place incrementally intensive warnings on the identified vandal's talk page. (I only hope you have the authority to ultimately block the vandal as well :-) ) Can you hear my thunderous applause? Well done! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
  • .... your bot is too good, I swear. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  • One more. Thank you very much. I've never seen a false positive reverted, and I've looked at many reversions. Well done. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 11:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • ...Dang! I was all excited to revert my first vandalism, and this bot beat me to the punch! Great job on this one! --Ye Olde Luke 02:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Great job of removing vandalism and updating pages--Check It Out. 20:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • This bot has kept my skating page clean and vandalism free for months. Truly fantastic. Thank you! Michael (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Wow! Vandalism found & fixed as I saw it. Amazingly awesome! --Joe Sewell (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Congratulations. The bot you have created performs well its purpose of keeping Wikipedia clean from vandalism attempts (as an e.g.: by reverting an edition by IP 69.253.47.112 and simultaneously warning the anon user about his/her deplorable conduct). Well done! Cheers. --Tekto9 (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • One hell of a bot... great asset to the vandalfighting efforts around here! :) Jmlk17 09:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Thank you for reverting vandalism in a flash. Awesome bot you are! PeaceNT (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Best bot on the site! Must have been down a few days ago, because I was actually making it to the edits without finding that they had been reverted before I could click. Brilliant work. RedZionX 15:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Wow! I see vandalism, go to edit and in that instant it's gone. Amazing bot! Congratulations! Blake01 18:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • You make excellent AIV reports, had never to decline one. --Oxymoron83 18:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Well done, cluebot; the page I vandalized was caught by you and reverted in under 20 seconds. Its that kind of dedication that our main page article(s) need to leave those who visit with a positive sense of the encyclopdia. 129.108.96.106 (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Wiki would be in total shambles without this bot around. Among the most effective bots of all here, and it's fast. Oh so fast. A cup of cheer to Cluebot! ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 17:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Too many times have you beat me to reverting vandalism. Happy editing! Nol888(Talk)(Review) 18:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I, for one, welcome our robot overlords as effective in cleaning up vandalism created by the lesser of my species. Thanks Cluebot! Libertycookies (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I thank the creators of this amazing bot. I have to thank the bot for clearing up vandalism so quickly and I say keep the good work up. Hasseniqbal192 (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Great bot! Not only does it revert page-blank vandalism, but it also reverts minor vandal edits that nobody else catches! - FISDOF9 03:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Turns recent change patrolling into a game of fastest finger. Jon Ace T C 23:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Save some vandals for the rest of us! :-) Seriously, though, keep up the good work. DJBullfish (talk) 02:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you for tagging 163.153.156.13. The student was located,had their computer privileges revoked, and wrote an apology on a manual typewriter. NERIC-Security (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you ClueBot, you are so amazing and fast to clean up vandalism. Thank You! PseudoOne (talk) 18:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
  • HUGGLE pwns you Cluebot but I still got nothin' but love for ya! ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 10:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks so much for reverting useless edits (vandalism). Cheers, Weirdy Talk 07:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I really like your articles. This is my first time using wikipedia.com and i am sorry if i changed your articles. anyway can you write one about rugby? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.237.181 .174 (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Wow, dude. You've beat me like three times today to the punch in RVing vandalism. What you deserve is a Wikicookie, awarded above. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 17:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank God for the antivandal bots. 80 Mk.82s on target...I like that image. They're really helping out right now against those IP vandals. They just all had to choose now to hit, didn't they? Sandy of the CSARs (talk) 01:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks Mr Bot for unblanking the Soup page! Cls14 (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • How did you program this bot so well? His contributions page is in the ten-thousands and most/all of it is reverting vandalism! Best bot I've seen in a long time.--Phanaj (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you, ClueBot, for saving editors the work that they just don't have time for. You are truely an example to the rest of us. --Delta1989 (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your reconstructive edits, a champ in the rvv war! Leevanjackson (talk) 02:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
  • So far, I can't race with you on reverting vandalism. Alexius08 (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I've seen ~75 reverts thusfar, and not a single false positive yet. Congratulations on a well-trained bot. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 01:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I love you ClueBot! You've done so much for the community - you're fast, and are very smart with your intelligently designed scoring system by your master Cobi. You seem to have your own personality and spirit and take pride in your work. Congratulations on your ~450,000 reverts and keeping Wikipedia clean and strong. PseudoOne 23:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • UR AWESOME! And I know as i am constantly getting messages from you (i use a network and an account because of the idiots at my school). I see some vandalism and go to edit it, just to find out that it's gone! by you! U ROCK! Matthew (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • If only I had a dime for every time you've beat me to reverting vandalism. I'd be richer than Bill Gates :) --On the other side Contribs|@ 03:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
  • ClueBot is funny. A difference like this one has a subject line referring to possible vandalism? That's funny (but the vandalism being reverted is not)! Thanks for helping reduce the damage vandals do to the project. Aleta Sing 23:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • One of the few bots I find useful. --Bobak (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • No false positive here :). Thanks for making it. Cristan (talk) 09:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Image:KCAPTCHA with crowded symbols.gif I have challenged your CAPTCHA illiteracy! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!--Editor510 (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Just kidding. Oh and whoever runs this amazing guy, ClueBot is in my Wikistory as one of the Wiki Justice League! Thank Dfrg.msc not me!

Contributions

My Contributions

Source

Bot source


ClueBots
ClueBot/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script · ClueBot III/Archive
ClueBot IV/Open Proxy Clerk · ClueBot VI/WP:CHUU Clerk  · Talk
Cobi/Owner · Talk · Contributions