User talk:Clpo13
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
Put your rants or raves below. Be nice. Failing that, just be civil. If you're neither, I'll ignore you or report you depending on my mood and the outcome of my specially-designed random query device (read: a quarter).
Also, to keep things organized, I'll reply to comments made on this talk page right below them, not on your talk page, unless otherwise requested. Be sure to check up on this page to see any responses I may have made.
[edit] Jakezing and Dgmjr05
Sorry if this breaks your talk page, but I think we can say that South Harmon Is gonna be redirected, at this point are good freind who keeps insulting me is trying to use older votes from the first deletion and a big rant about how "were criminals and just as bad as harmon."--Jakezing (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dgmjr is getting way out of line with comments like this one ("illiterate user"? That's uncalled for.). If he continues you give you trouble, you may wish to file a Wikiquette alert, if you haven't already. --clpo13(talk) 17:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's great if people's first language isn't English. In that case, why would they be worried about English pages? Furthermore, how should I be expected to communicate with them if I can't understand them? Dgmjr05 (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- There are many reasons to want to edit in English. It's not uncommon to edit multiple language versions of Wikipedia. And even if a person doesn't edit in another language, they may wish to practice their English or improve the largest version of Wikipedia (the English one). And honestly, if you can't understand broken English, that's your own problem. I've seen written English far worse than Jakezing's, which consists mostly of misspellings. Not a big deal. --clpo13(talk) 19:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Most of my bad english only extends into typing... Writing wise, it's great. I CAN contribute with an advanced level of Englisch if I want to. However; Fast typing & other things keep me from being perfect. Do not assume i am a retard, that my englisch skills are crap, or that you are better then me. You don't want to see me when you'v assumed to much about me. Also, you question me and us wit hthe rules of wikipedia, like NPA extra? I HAVE been banned before, so I know [plenty of the rules. Don't reply on my talk page.--Jakezing (talk) 21:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. I figured it was something like that, but I didn't want to assume too much. --clpo13(talk) 02:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Most of my bad english only extends into typing... Writing wise, it's great. I CAN contribute with an advanced level of Englisch if I want to. However; Fast typing & other things keep me from being perfect. Do not assume i am a retard, that my englisch skills are crap, or that you are better then me. You don't want to see me when you'v assumed to much about me. Also, you question me and us wit hthe rules of wikipedia, like NPA extra? I HAVE been banned before, so I know [plenty of the rules. Don't reply on my talk page.--Jakezing (talk) 21:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- There are many reasons to want to edit in English. It's not uncommon to edit multiple language versions of Wikipedia. And even if a person doesn't edit in another language, they may wish to practice their English or improve the largest version of Wikipedia (the English one). And honestly, if you can't understand broken English, that's your own problem. I've seen written English far worse than Jakezing's, which consists mostly of misspellings. Not a big deal. --clpo13(talk) 19:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's great if people's first language isn't English. In that case, why would they be worried about English pages? Furthermore, how should I be expected to communicate with them if I can't understand them? Dgmjr05 (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Frank Collin Article
You reverted my edit that stated that Collin is a child molester, apparently without reading the rest of the article. The citation of his conviction is in the third paragraph of the second section. 24.6.157.14 (talk) 16:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- That was over a month ago. At any rate, I reverted your changes because, while Collin is indeed a convicted child molester, that information wasn't necessary to the introduction. He's most famous for being the former leader of the National Socialist Party of America. Your edit also inserted the word "notorious", which seems to me to be quite POV. Thus, I reverted. --clpo13(talk) 17:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
