User talk:Cloud111
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Vagina.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vagina.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vagina.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vagina.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Vagina2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Vagina.jpg. The copy called Image:Vagina.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 08:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vagina2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vagina2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Labia2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Labia2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Vagina.pdf listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vagina.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Labia3.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Labia3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Pubichairremoved.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Pubichairremoved.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Jill Vanderbeek
A tag has been placed on Jill Vanderbeek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deleted
The article Jill Vanderbeek has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TigerShark (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Uploading images
Please stop uploading images with misleading descriptions and no obvious encyclopedic use such as Image:Nudegirl.JPG, unless you can provide a rationale for doing so. Without an explanation such uploading can be considered disruptive and may lead to you account being blocked from editing and uploading. Thanks TigerShark (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- And this is simply vandalism. If you continue with this type of editing you will be blocked. TigerShark (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
I have blocked you for vandalism on the basis of this edit following the warnings above. You can appeal this decision by following the process outlined here. TigerShark (talk) 11:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Intercourse.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Intercourse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 14:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to :Image:Intercourse.JPG, you will be blocked from editing. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 20:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked indefinitely
NawlinWiki (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Feet.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Feet.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin(talk) 02:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
