User talk:Clngre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clngre, nice work on Cumbre Vieja. Johntex 19:00, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Wow, thanks, thats nice of you to take the time and effort to say. Noted and appreciated --Clngre 22:06, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for the images on Traylor and Corbaz, and for the Madge Gill and Scottie Wilson articles; I can't express how very much you're my favorite Wikipedian of the moment. Philthecow 03:02, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks thats nice of you to say. I read your page and I like what youre doing. I too was dismayed by wikipedia's slim outsider art content and you kind of inspired me to be the change I want to see around me and finally start adding stuff. Its definately a worth-while project, I'll help it out however I can. I'm going to try to make an article on Natterer soon, if you dont get to it first. --Clngre 03:30, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Clngre, thanks for the nice words about my first wikipedia edit on my talk page. I see you are doing good work as well :) I have never really believed in open projects outside of the software domain, until I started to help shape wikipedia. Very cool. Fred Hsu 03:13, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Love the image. 68.81.231.127 10:26, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

neat. thats encouraging --Clngre 23:03, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

[edit] El Lissitzky

Very good job on El Lissitzky! I read on Peer Review you were playing with the idea of submitting it to FAC; by all means do so! I am a WP:FAC regular and I'm certain the nomination will pass. The only criticism the article as it is now is likely to receive is that the lead section is a bit short for an article of such length: it should give a better overview of the entire article. But you have really done excellent work there. Phils 21:09, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Nice of you to come by. I wasnt sure about it beign FAC grade, but I'll try now. I'll try to expand the lead section too, thanks for the heads up on that. --Clngre 21:27, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

[edit] Did you know...

[edit] Very nice images

I just saw your Drum Kit illustration, and wondered how you are making such images; i want to draw such nice pices too, please let me know (you dont have to, if you are thinkig of your method as a "professional secret"... i hope my english was correct, --Telcontar 20:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The drumkit one is traced, the other ones I've done aren't. Drums are way out of my ability to draw; you really have to be good with perspective, which I'm generally not. --Clngre 20:11, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

OK, then; btu do you generally scna hand-drewn images or make it on pc? --Telcontar 09:56, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No I just draw them with a mouse in photoshop. I wish I had a scanner because drawing by hand is much easier--Clngre 14:17, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

OK, thanks and again "nice pictures" yours Telcontar 18:41, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'd like to add my "well done" regarding Image:Drum kit illustration template.png; However you have done it, it's a great graphic and lifts these articles tremendously. Andrewa 12:20, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

thanks a lot, I appreciate the comment--Clngre 14:17, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] King Khalid Military City

Thanks for creating that article (with so rich info in it). I will try to make a list/category for other military cities and combine it with the Military of Saudi Arabia article. -- Eagle 13:03, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

sounds good --Clngre 13:15, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

How did you know all the info you wrote in that article? Have you been there or just by reading and whatnot? Just being curious -- Eagle 18:20, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

i dont remember exactly, it was a long time ago. i heard of it somewhere, thought it sounded interesting, and made a place-holder article on it. contrary to popular belief, there are still a lot of interesting topics that dont have articles on them yet --Clngre 21:27, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Petrarch

Hi- please be careful when reverting vandalism, they do all sorts of tricks. [1]. -- Stbalbach 06:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

weird... was that my error or was that some kind of hack they put in that made that happen? in either case thanks a lot for coming and taking the time to give me a heads up, ill definitely double check with this in the future. in fact, i have some more rv's to go check on --Clngre 07:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nikon F5 digital back?

You altered Leica R8 stating that there was a digital back for the Nikon F5, so the Leica wasn't the only one. Could you elaborate? If this is the case, perhaps the Nikon F5 article should mention it?

Are you talking about the F5s that Kodak modified into digital cameras? These were not sold as a separate "digital back" though, but as one piece as a Kodak product, the DCS Pro 600 and 700 series. They did still say 'Nikon' on the prism, of course.

I'd personally say these do not qualify as digital backs since they were not user-installable to a F5, and I'm not sure that the F5s so modified were identical to a standard F5 - in other words, could you remove the digital back, install a Nikon film back, and have a working, complete F5? I'd say they probably had at least a few other components missing. Modified film cameras converted into digital don't in my experience get called 'digital backs', that tending to be reserved for user-installable components.

In any case, let me know, because it sounds like some articles need updating whichever way round is the case! Thanks, Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 20:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for writing me this.

I was talking about the Kodak one, yes. You sound much more capable of judging if it technically qualifies as a digitial back or not, I just assumed it was because it replaced the original back, although, I agree, it did so in a way that might not be so comparable to the digital back for the Leica. I think you're right. --Clngre 21:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I think I'll put some info under Nikon F5 about those Kodaks, and perhaps I should qualify the statement at Leica R8 that we're talking about user-installable backs. Also need to write articles on more of those groundbreaking Kodak DSLR conversions - pretty much all of them were remarkably high-end for the time. Thanks! Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 18 August 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kengir uprising, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

[edit] Solzhenitsyn

Nice of you to keep track on the Solzhenitsyn article: he's certainly a guy who attracts POVs and I knew when I read the text it could use some revision. My work on him was really a spin-off of revising the Gulag Archipelago article which was truly stuffed with some politically charged and wildly overstated comments ("the publication of the book immediately blew up the Communist parties of Western Europe", "the camps were unknown to the West" etc) I don't think an article about the Archipelago of this kind can be written completely without any subjective statements, but at least one can make the reader aware of where they are.

I'm going to follow up with an article about S' epic The Red Wheel in not too long a time.

I see you've written about Roy Andersson, are you Scandinavian too? Strausszek August 28, 2006 19:55 (CET)

I checked out your changes to the Gulag Archipelago article and I definitely agree that they're for the best. I was looking sadly at that article a while ago but couldn't get motivated to improve it, its really good you came along. While we are on the subject, you might be interested to check out the article that I'm working on now and that I'm trying to get approved for FA status. See Kengir uprising and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kengir uprising. If there is anything you can do to help out on that article, including just giving it a once-over and making sure I didn't misstate anything, it'd be greatly appreciated, especially now that it's under review. Also, you wouldn't happen to know any other major sources that deal with the uprising, would you? Currently one of the main objections to the article is that its primarily sourced from one book, the Gulag Archipelago.

No, I'm a Canadian and not of Scandinavian descent, I just love Andersson and other Scandinavian directors. Ever since I saw Andersson's "Something Has Happened" I've been pretty infatuated with his work and work like it. I actually just watched it again a few days ago and could hardly believe how good it is. I adore his approach and deadpan sense of humour. That deadpan sense of humour in particular seems to be a really "Scandinavian" quality and it's something that I admire. --Clngre 18:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Roy is brilliant, and his commercials are great too; they show up the same black humour as Songs from the Sécond Floor. If you've seen Lars von Trier's tv series The Kingdom (not easy to get in America) it's in the same vein, even more charming. I feel Roy is really of an older generation, most younger tv/movie comics in Sweden don't have this dark, daredevil bite, but he's inspiring the kids.

I put in a draft article on The Red Wheel, will expand it later. The final paragraph is POV of course, but I feel this is justified within limits when it's a Nobel prize winning writer and it's obviously, to the reader, a subjective opinion. Your article looks fine, I'll read it over and look for other sources on the Kengir revolt. Strausszek August 29 2006, 00:22 (CET)

Yes his commercials are fantastic. I saw a collection of them a few years ago at the local art theatre and they really blew me, and everyone else there, away. The one commercial that I particularly enjoyed (and if you've seen it and can help me identify it I'd be ecstatic) was an ad in support of some political party and against a more laissez faire capitalism that just showed a little series of instances of ruthlessness and selfishness (a guy who dropped something on the floor in a busy walkway and everyone else just kicking his belongings around indifferently, for instance) that was really hilarious. But I didn't know that Andersson wasn't so indicative of the whole and that his style of humour was as relatively unique as that within Scandinavia. I certainly hoped it wasn't.

I'll check out that article on the Red Wheel and add what I can, but it looks good now. How much of his work have you read? Most? I've read only a handful and haven't touched that series yet, but intend to. --Clngre 23:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The campaign short feature is Någonting har hänt (World of glory), he shot it for the socialists in time for the 1991 parliamentary elections (which they lost). It's got really dark scenes: the pick-up car that's stuffed full with helpless/naked people and then driven away like a cattle-train to a prison camp, wasn't it even pumped full of car exhaust gases to kill the people inside? We're in for the next elections in three weeks time, and it's very uncertain but could well be a watershed, confidence in politics here is at an all-time low and the campaign has been very media-ridden, sluggish and not really taking off in people's minds. I wish someone would make as daring a movie as Roy did in '91. I don't know who to vote for either, the Socialists seem to be half-rotten with power and the prime minister (who effectively is the government: we need to change that) looks ready for retirement, the alternatives on the liberal/right-wing side are hazy and seem to harbour a big bunch of career-hunters and some really hardcore libertarians. It's a bit like France in 2002 (when le Pen rocketed to the final round). Happily, ther's no real risk of an overtly xenophobic party entering the parliament but a lot of other things could happen.

Yeah i've read a few by Solzhenitsyn: The Gulag Archipelago, One day in the Life of I.D., August 1914, Lenin in Zurich, The Oak and the Calf, Incident at Krechetovka station (brilliant story about mistrust, paranoia and the complicity of the ordinary "good man" in a police state), some other short stories, his Nobel lecture, plus parts of October 1916, From under the Rubble and The First Circle - and a few books about the circumstances around his Nobel prize. He was, simply put, one of my gateways to Russian literature. Strausszek August 29 2006 01:55 (CET)

I should have clarified; I'm familiar with World of Glory and have seen it a few times (but I had no idea it was also for a political party). What I'm talking about is a 30 second television commercial. It actually might have been a part of the same campaign so I think this is a good starting point for my search for it. By the way, have you seen, and if so what did you think of, A Swedish Love Story?

I follow a lot of international news and everything but I know absolutely zero about Sweden's present domestic political situation. The scenario you recounted does certainly sound familiar though. I don't know how much you follow Canadian politics (haha), but there was a similar situation last election, where there was a choice between a flaky opposition party and somewhat corrupt ruling party. Apathy reigned pretty heavily on that one. I'd always suggest getting involved and voting, though, and I'd personally err on the side of the left rather than the right. And value your proportional representation! I wish Canada had that but unfortunately we don't and we're definitely all the worse for it.

You've read much more than myself but I definitely share your enthusiasm for him. I've only read the Gulag Archipelago (at 1800 pages maybe I shouldn't say "only"), a collection of short stories (including Incident at ...), One Day in the Life, and I just finished The Love-Girl and the Innocent, which was really enjoyable. I'm currently racing to finish another book of his before school starts next week because I know I won't have the opportunity for months afterwards, which is a sad thought. --Clngre 01:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I found that commercial I was talking about (should've thought of youtube for this): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ofPRv29RMs at around 1:35. Brilliant commercial, I must say. --Clngre 01:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

About World of Glory, it's fifteen years ago so I vaguely remember that campaign but I guess the longer film wasn't part of the actual campaign, it was done about the same time and shares some of the imagery; I think it was really part of some joint project of "commenting the times". But you're right about the shorties I think, Roy did a number of shorts for the Socialists and I'm almost positive that was in '91, the scene with the man who slumps to the floor would have belonged there and I remember the image (thanks for the youtube link! The frying-pan ad is new to me, hilarious bitch...)

Haven't seen A Swedish Love Story so far but it's a real classic.

A few years ago a now defunct morning paper made an outrageous printing blooper when they had an article about an expo on Roy Andersson's work (it was up the country so I didn't find the time to go) and the same day, another piece in the paper, on another spread, discussed Danish cinema and the dogma film movement. Beside the Roy article they meant to have a still photo from Giliap and got at least the caption right: "Thommy Berggren played the morose waiter in Giliap"

The picture above wasn't quite that: it was a famous still from Nicolaus Winding Refn's noir thriller Pusher with Kim Bodnia staring right up and thrusting two pistols, one in each clenched hand, toward his antagonist. :-D I don't recall what happened next to the Danish movies article.

I'm fluent in French and English, have found some work as a translator, and I'm decent at German (no problem reading German books, less sure in writing it myself) I'm trawling through some mail and other stuff and downloading a movie, which is why I'm up at 4 in the morning. Would really like to learn Russian, well maybe some day... Strausszek August 29, 03:50 (CET)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Artwork_by_El_Lissitzky_c1930.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Artwork_by_El_Lissitzky_c1930.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Roy Andersson director.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Roy Andersson director.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 03:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for help

I noticed that you were instrumental in bringing a recent article to FA status. I have been trying to get the Ohio Wesleyan University article to FA status. One of the critical areas for the article that remains an issue is copyediting and prose. I was wondering if you might be willing to help me in this area? I'd greatly appreciate it! Thank you. WikiprojectOWU 22:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

How flattering! I'm certainly no expert at this stuff but I am an English-speaker and am at least somewhat competant, so I'll definitely come by (tomorrow) and read it and do whatever I can to help you in way of editing and suggestions. --Clngre 13:31, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear Clngre, I just nominated the Ohio Wesleyan University page in the FAC process. Since my last request here, I have put a lot hours with the League of Copyeditors trying to improve it. Feel free to provide your opinion and feedback on the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ohio Wesleyan University page. Thank you so much in advance! I greatly appreciate it! LaSaltarella 22:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:A_Prounen_by_El_Lissitzky_c.1925.jpg

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:The_Constructor_self_portrait_by_El_Lissitzky_1925.jpg

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Merz_Magazine_Layout_by_El_Lissitzky_1924.jpg

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Back_cover_of_Nasci_by_El_Lissitzky_1924.jpg

[edit] Image:Hostile_takeover_mugging.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hostile_takeover_mugging.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Alvin_lucier_promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alvin_lucier_promo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Time_magazine_28-06-1954_Arbenz.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Time_magazine_28-06-1954_Arbenz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Nicholas_D_Kristof.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicholas_D_Kristof.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 16:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Stanley_Kubrick_on_set_of_Paths_of_Glory.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stanley_Kubrick_on_set_of_Paths_of_Glory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Image:Young_Stanley_Kubrick.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Young_Stanley_Kubrick.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Horizon-202-open-back.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Horizon-202-open-back.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stuttering FAR

Stuttering has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Erich Maria Remarque Institute

I have nominated Erich Maria Remarque Institute, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Maria Remarque Institute. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Noetic Sage 01:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)