User talk:ClivePIA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Is Wikipedia the least welcoming corner of the internet? Patrolled by power-hungry obsessives that delete anything they don't understand? 2 Speedy deletion of Neilson Active Holidays 3 Duplicate Image:NeilsonLogo.jpg 4 Image tagging for Image:NeilsonLogoSmall.jpg 5 Deletion of article

[edit] Is Wikipedia the least welcoming corner of the internet? Patrolled by power-hungry obsessives that delete anything they don't understand?

[edit] Speedy deletion of Neilson Active Holidays

A tag has been placed on Neilson Active Holidays requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pumpmeup^{(is awake!)} 18:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate Image:NeilsonLogo.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:NeilsonLogo.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:NeilsonLogo.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:NeilsonLogo.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:NeilsonLogoSmall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NeilsonLogoSmall.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of article

Your article was very clearly promoting a company. Wikipedia does not allow spam articles. For your article to not be considered spam, you would need to A.) assert why the company is notable (why is it more notable than the hundereds of other comapnies that do similar things?) and B.) Back up those assertions with reliable third party sources. In short, simply telling us the company is notable is not good enough, there has to be a reliable source confirming the assertion. Hope this helps. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is againt orignial research. If there are no third party sources that cover the material you are entering here, then it should not belong. Being you know the people who set up the company, you also may have a conflict of interest. In short, it is obvious that the company may be unique but unless there is third party references covering it, it is not notable enough to have an article here. Hope that helps. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)