Talk:Clinton Doctrine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject International relations This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, an attempt to provide information in a consistent format for articles about international organizations, diplomats, international meetings, and relations between states.
If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
United Nations This article is part of the United Nations WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a group devoted to the the study, and improvement of Wikipedia articles on the subject, of History. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Problem with this article

This article doesn't cite anyone who actually calls this alleged doctrine the Clinton Doctrine. Probably a good candidate for AFD. Tempshill 17:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Who says you have to? What the Clinton Doctrine is defined as is fairly well-known-- which brings me to my next point: Why is this article considered non-notable? The Clinton Doctrine IS a foreign policy doctrine of the United States, and people, including academics in the foreign relations field, do use it to describe the humanitarian slant that the United States took after the end of the Cold War. After the Kennan Doctrine, the Clinton Doctrine was intended to be a major shift in post-Cold War thinking. Obviously, 9/11 changed this, but while it was in effect, it guided American foreign policy for two terms of Clinton, and even the first part of Bush's first year in office.GrumF14 18:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clinton Doctrine not a clear statement?

The article claims that the Clinton Doctrine is just a small quote blurb. As far as I know, however, the Clinton Doctrine is a rather large set of guidelines on troop deployment, with the NSS-96 (http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nss/nss-96.htm) at its core. While the general idea of the doctrine is captured in this wikipedia article, it seems to suggest that no proper elaboration of the ideas was ever made, while Clinton in fact did codify his belief in (humanitarian) interventionism. tijmz 20:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citation

The citation for Clinton regretting Rwanda comes from My Life, p. 593, published by Alfred A. Knopf, 2004 in New York.GrumF14 18:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)