Talk:Clindamycin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
..what is a penal cap? —This unsigned comment was added by Seyon (talk • contribs) .
- ...good question. Ask this guy, he put it there. —Keenan Pepper 03:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Acne
"However, Clindamycin is rarely effective alone when treating acne. Studies have shown it to be most effective when used in conjunction with benzoyl peroxide."
Is there a source for this statement? I ask because it runs contrary to what I have heard elsewhere. Not that this makes it false obviously, but it seems there should at least be a footnote or something, or remove the statement if nobody knows where its from. 15:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Since reworded, with appropriate citations. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA nom
I'll do a review for GA in the next few days. Jimfbleak (talk) 07:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- First quick read through:
- I tweaked a couple of places and added a missing ")"
- Thanks; I don't really get the point of this parenthesis, though? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Main first-thoughts issue: "Mechanism of action" and "Interactions" are very short sections which largely repeat each other: compare in a similar way to erythromycin, azithromycin and chloramphenicol, by binding to the 50S subunit of the bacterial ribosome. This causes antagonism if administered simultaneously with those drugs, and possible cross-resistance. with Its similarity to the mechanism of action of macrolides and chloramphenicol means they should not be given simultaneously, as this causes antagonism and possible cross-resistance. The duplication needs to go, but that would make one of the sections too short - can they be rolled up or reorganised?
- Yes, I noticed that (the duplication). I'll reword the "Interactions" section; it will get shorter, but there really aren't that many clinically relevant interactions of clindamycin to begin with AFAIK. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've gone the other way round (more logical): kept that info in the "Interactions" section and removed it from "Mechanism of action". I've also added a note on study of the complex between clindamycin and the ribosome, and the fact that a crystal structure of the complex has been published. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I noticed that (the duplication). I'll reword the "Interactions" section; it will get shorter, but there really aren't that many clinically relevant interactions of clindamycin to begin with AFAIK. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Is there a photo of the product available? (not essential)
- I don't think so. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article nomination
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
I've made a few minor tweaks, can't see anything else, so PASS Jimfbleak (talk) 13:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)