Wikipedia:Cleanup/September

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] September 2005

• Direct-to-video - Poorly written, lack of info, badly designed and senseless.

• Still not pretty. Nswinton 21:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Nancy Astor, Viscountess Astor is in need of some reorganization. Various sections could probably be subcategorized (for example: 'Virginia', 'New York' and 'England' — although I'm not sure what heading they could fall under; also, 'Parliament' and 'The House doesn't miss anybody' should probably go together). jareha 05:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

• NPOV and unreferenced still. Nswinton 21:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Frame of reference - very long paragraphs, particularly in the lead.

• Fixed spelling of title (moved page). -- Igiffin 04:44, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• Needs expert help. Nswinton 21:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Involution (philosophy) - possibly overenthusiastic capitalization.

• Besides possibly narrow worldview, this articles isn't in terribly bad shape. Nswinton 21:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Nursing Informatics - majority of article is a reprint of a memo from a company which lists opportunities in the field. This seems inappropriate material for Wikipedia. Also, external references not formatted standard way.--Vitamin D 19:25, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Right now (4/07)there is really only an opening definition and 6 more definitions in the definition section! Some good refs but no article. tagged for expand. --killing sparrows 06:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

• Margaret Mitchell One of the most prominent and famous American novelists. --ThomasK 16:02, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

• I can't find an online source, but the central unwikified section, Margaret Mitchell#Gone With the Wind, reeks of copyvio. Tearlach 00:47, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Patriarch Eutychius of Constantinople - the two sections need to be merged and modified into modern and more comprehensive English. 69.196.116.29 23:54, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

• Completely unresolved and unedited since posted. --Lendorien 21:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• I've done a fair bit of work on it, but there's still a lot to be done. It really requires more of an expert eye than I have since it's pretty specialized information. --edi 04:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Simulacrum - Starts with an old defintion, then says there's a new, more popular definition, then talks about a whole bunch of things unrelated to each other only separated by paragraphs (meaning it needs to be divided into subsections and preferably more ordered:). Kreachure 22:25, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

• This issue is still present. Little effort has been doen to fix it. --Lendorien 20:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• Contributions of User:Kjrajesh - pretty much all this user's articles need to be cleaned up. - Mike Rosoft 20:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

• I've cleaned up quite a few of his articles but there seem to be hundreds of them! Woblosch 21:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Theistic realism - page is made for basically a neologism that is mostly set up by Phillip E. Johnson to explain a theistic way of understanding intelligent design or creation science. The context of this is not clear, nor is the work particulary of high quality. Joshuaschroeder 06:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

• Still needs work. Lacks sources. --Lendorien 20:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)