User talk:Cleome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Cleome! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Isis4563 22:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Hello, Cleome!

I like your photograph! Ohio Mailman 23:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coulter edit

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. In relation to your edit to "Ann Coulter", note that the stuff you put back is already covered in a footnote, which also gives a link to further information in the fitting article, "Canada and the Vietnam War".
Cordially, Lonewolf BC 16:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

(moved to here from my talk-page, for sake of continuity -- LW)

The facts at the root of a "factual accuracy" discussion should be in the article, not in a footnote or a referenced article, shouldn't they? Cleome 18:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

You might want to raise that on the article's talkpage, but I recommend that you read relevant parts of the talkpage archives first, to see what the thinking was behind what stands. -- Lonewolf BC 19:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Less-than-honest editors

The wolfman/wolfgirl fits the description. 72.77.19.206 00:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)