User talk:Clemen Wilcox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Speedy deletion of Luz A Salento Foundation
A tag has been placed on Luz A Salento Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Guldenat (talk) 03:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Luz A Salento Foundation
A tag has been placed on Luz A Salento Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RichardΩ612 13:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy Deletion
If you feel that a page was not a viable candidate for speedy deletion, you need to take the matter to deletion review or contact the deleting admin. Thanks! ><RichardΩ612 13:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Firstly, I am not an administrator, did not delete the article and therefore cannot email you a copy. You will need to ask User:Jmlk17, who deleted the article or another administrator to do this. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages by adding ~~~~ to the end. This helps others to keep track of discussion. Thanks. ><RichardΩ612 13:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've restored the draft to your user space at User:Clemen Wilcox/Luz A Salento Foundation..--Tikiwont (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring my draft. How can I go back to publish the article...do I need to create a new one, or can I use the restored one?? Thanks.--Clemen Wilcox (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- You should try to improve the restored draft taking into account our notability guideline for organizations, as you don't want it to get deleted again. Once you're confident, you can either copy and paste the code to mainspace or move it. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- You did all right with the article, but it seems that there isn't enough to work with. The foundation itself seems to be not sufficiently notable by our standards. Isn't there any third party coverage in newspapers etc? Otherwise it remains a deletion candidate. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The links you posted on my page aren't really articles. --Tikiwont (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The last reference is something. If the article gets challenged another time, merging to Salento, Quindío might be an option.--Tikiwont (talk) 07:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)